Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.
Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression—death's universal reign proves universal guilt. Even those who didn't commit explicit transgression παράβασις (parabasis, 'violation of known command') like Adam (Genesis 2:17) still died, demonstrating inherited Adamic guilt and corruption. The verb ἐβασίλευσεν (ebasileusen, 'reigned') personifies death as a tyrant exercising dominion.
Who is the figure of him that was to come—Adam is τύπος (typos, 'type/pattern/foreshadowing') of Christ. Federal headship unites the two: Adam's one act affects all his descendants, Christ's one act affects all His people. But the analogy is one of contrast (verses 15-19 emphasize 'not as... so also...'): Adam brought condemnation, Christ brings justification; Adam's act resulted in death's reign, Christ's in grace reigning through righteousness.
Historical Context
Paul's Adam-Christ typology became foundational for Christian theology. The church fathers used it to explain the incarnation's necessity: only a new Adam could undo the first Adam's work. Where Adam failed in the garden, Christ succeeded in Gethsemane; where Adam's disobedience brought curse, Christ's obedience brought blessing. This typology appears throughout Scripture (1 Corinthians 15:22, 45-49) and informs doctrines of original sin, federal representation, and Christ's active obedience.
Questions for Reflection
What does Adam being a 'type' of Christ teach about God's plan from creation for salvation through representative headship?
How does federal headship (one person's act affecting many) challenge Western individualism that rejects corporate solidarity?
If you accept being affected by Adam's sin, on what grounds would you reject the offer of being affected by Christ's righteousness?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression—death's universal reign proves universal guilt. Even those who didn't commit explicit transgression παράβασις (parabasis, 'violation of known command') like Adam (Genesis 2:17) still died, demonstrating inherited Adamic guilt and corruption. The verb ἐβασίλευσεν (ebasileusen, 'reigned') personifies death as a tyrant exercising dominion.
Who is the figure of him that was to come—Adam is τύπος (typos, 'type/pattern/foreshadowing') of Christ. Federal headship unites the two: Adam's one act affects all his descendants, Christ's one act affects all His people. But the analogy is one of contrast (verses 15-19 emphasize 'not as... so also...'): Adam brought condemnation, Christ brings justification; Adam's act resulted in death's reign, Christ's in grace reigning through righteousness.