Job 33:14

For God speaketh once, yea twice, yet man perceiveth it not.

Word-by-Word Analysis

כִּֽי

H3588

(by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below); often largely modified by other particles annexed

בְאַחַ֥ת

H259

once

properly, united, i.e., one; or (as an ordinal) first

יְדַבֶּר

H1696

speaketh

perhaps properly, to arrange; but used figuratively (of words), to speak; rarely (in a destructive sense) to subdue

אֵ֑ל

H410

For God

strength; as adjective, mighty; especially the almighty (but used also of any deity)

וּ֝בִשְׁתַּ֗יִם

H8147

yea twice

two; also (as ordinal) twofold

לֹ֣א

H3808

not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles

יְשׁוּרֶֽנָּה׃

H7789

yet man perceiveth

to spy out, i.e., (generally) survey, (for evil) lurk for, (for good) care for

Analysis

Within the broader context of Job, this passage highlights salvation through declarative statements that establish theological truth. The theological weight of divine sovereignty connects to fundamental Christian doctrine about divine sovereignty, contributing to our understanding of God's nature and relationship with humanity. This verse contributes to the book's overall argument by building upon previous themes while advancing the overall message of Job.

Historical Context

This passage must be understood within the political and social structures of the biblical period. The author writes to address believers seeking to understand God's will and purposes, making the emphasis on salvation particularly relevant. Historical documents from this period show cultural practices and social structures that would have been familiar to the original readers, illuminating the verse's original impact.

Questions for Reflection

How might the original audience's understanding of divine sovereignty differ from modern interpretations, and what bridges can be built between ancient meaning and contemporary application?
What systematic theological implications arise from this verse's treatment of salvation, and how does it contribute to a biblical theology of soteriology and the doctrine of salvation?
What practical applications emerge from understanding salvation as presented in this verse, particularly in light of addressing questions of religious pluralism and the exclusivity of Christ?