Ruth 1:12
Turn again, my daughters, go your way; for I am too old to have an husband. If I should say, I have hope, if I should have an husband also to night, and should also bear sons;
Original Language Analysis
Historical Context
Ancient Near Eastern society provided few options for elderly widows. Without social security, retirement savings, or institutional care for the aged, widows depended on adult sons for survival. Multiple Old Testament texts address care for widows (Exodus 22:22; Deuteronomy 10:18; 14:29; 24:17-21; 27:19; Isaiah 1:17; James 1:27), indicating both God's concern and society's frequent neglect. Prophets condemned exploitation of widows (Isaiah 10:1-2; Ezekiel 22:7; Malachi 3:5), while wisdom literature celebrated those who helped them (Job 29:13; 31:16-22; Proverbs 15:25).
Naomi's self-assessment as "too old" for remarriage and childbearing reflects realistic understanding of her situation. Unlike Sarah, who bore Isaac at ninety (a miraculous, exceptional event—Genesis 17:17; 18:11-14), Naomi expects no divine intervention. Her bitterness in verses 13 and 20-21 suggests she believes God has abandoned her, making miraculous provision unimaginable. This contrasts with Abraham and Sarah's eventual faith (Hebrews 11:11-12) and foreshadows the book's theme: God provides redemption through unexpected, ordinary means (Ruth and Boaz) that reveal extraordinary providence.
The emphasis on remarriage "tonight" and immediately bearing sons highlights the absurdity. Even if possible, pregnancy takes nine months, childhood many years. Verse 13 makes explicit what verse 12 implies: waiting would be unreasonable. Naomi's airtight logic demonstrates that human wisdom, when separated from trust in God's providence, leads to hopelessness. The book of Ruth systematically dismantles this hopelessness by showing how God weaves redemption through circumstances that seemed to offer no hope.
Questions for Reflection
- What situations has God used to strip away your 'hopeful' human plans so He could reveal His better plans?
- How does focusing solely on visible resources and human possibilities limit your faith in God's redemptive creativity?
- Are you willing to obey God even when obedience appears to lead away from the only rational path to security?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
Turn again, my daughters, go your way; for I am too old to have an husband. If I should say, I have hope, if I should have an husband also to night, and should also bear sons; Naomi intensifies her argument with brutal realism. The repetition "Turn again" (shovnah, שֹׁבְנָה) plus "go your way" (lekhnah, לֵכְנָה) creates emphatic dismissal—she's urging them away. "I am too old to have an husband" (zakanti mihyot le'ish, זָקַנְתִּי מִהְיוֹת לְאִישׁ) states biological reality: she has aged past (zakanti) the possibility of marriage and childbearing.
The hypothetical construction "If I should say, I have hope" (ki amarta yesh-li tikvah, כִּי אָמַרְתִּי יֶשׁ־לִי תִקְוָה) introduces an impossible scenario. "Hope" (tikvah, תִּקְוָה) means expectation or prospect—the same word used for the scarlet cord Rahab hung from her window (Joshua 2:18, 21), symbolizing hope of deliverance. Naomi protests she has no such hope, no thread of expectation to cling to. Even if the absurd occurred—remarriage "tonight" (halaylah, הַלַּיְלָה, emphasizing immediacy) and bearing sons—this wouldn't help her daughters-in-law.
The verse's piling of hypotheticals (if... if... and also...) creates rhetorical force: even granting every impossible condition, the logic still fails. Naomi's argument moves from biological impossibility (too old) through hypothetical absurdity (remarriage tonight, immediate conception, bearing sons) toward the crushing conclusion in verse 13: even if all this happened, the daughters-in-law couldn't reasonably wait. Her reasoning is irrefutable by human calculation—yet God's redemption operates beyond human calculation, accomplishing what seems impossible.