And he answered and told them, Elias verily cometh first, and restoreth all things; and how it is written of the Son of man, that he must suffer many things, and be set at nought.
Jesus affirmed, 'Elias verily cometh first, and restoreth all things' (Ἠλίας μὲν ἐλθὼν πρῶτον ἀποκαθιστάνει πάντα). The verb apokathistanei (ἀποκαθιστάνει, 'restores') indicates comprehensive restoration—Elijah's forerunner ministry would prepare hearts for Messiah. John the Baptist fulfilled this role, calling Israel to repentance (Mark 1:4). Jesus then asks, 'how it is written of the Son of man, that he must suffer many things, and be set at nought?' (πῶς γέγραπται ἐπὶ τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ ἀνθρώπου ἵνα πολλὰ πάθῃ καὶ ἐξουδενηθῇ;). This juxtaposes restoration with suffering—both are scripturally necessary. Isaiah 53 prophesies the suffering servant 'despised and rejected' (exoudenēthē, ἐξουδενηθῇ). Jesus teaches that Messiah's glory comes through suffering, not despite it. The 'must' (hina, ἵνα, expressing divine purpose) indicates suffering isn't accidental but central to redemptive plan. Reformed theology emphasizes Christ's passive and active obedience—suffering God's wrath (passive) and perfectly obeying (active) to accomplish salvation.
Historical Context
Jewish messianic expectation focused on conquering king (Psalm 2; Isaiah 9:6-7; Daniel 7:13-14), largely ignoring suffering servant passages (Isaiah 42; 49; 50; 53). The Dead Sea Scrolls and other Second Temple literature reveal messianic hopes centered on military victory over Rome. Jesus radically redefined expectations by emphasizing scriptural suffering. Isaiah 53 describes the servant 'despised and rejected,' bearing sin and being 'cut off' for transgressions. Psalm 22 graphically depicts crucifixion suffering. These texts were considered prophetic but not clearly messianic in first-century Judaism. Jesus' interpretive key—the Messiah must suffer—was revolutionary. Early Christian apologetics centered on showing that Scripture prophesied a suffering Messiah (Acts 17:2-3; 26:22-23), not theological innovation but proper Old Testament interpretation.
Questions for Reflection
How does Jesus' teaching that both restoration (Elijah) and suffering (Son of Man) are scripturally necessary challenge one-sided theologies emphasizing either triumph or suffering alone?
What does the 'must' of suffering reveal about the essential nature of Christ's atoning work—not optional but divinely purposed?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
Jesus affirmed, 'Elias verily cometh first, and restoreth all things' (Ἠλίας μὲν ἐλθὼν πρῶτον ἀποκαθιστάνει πάντα). The verb apokathistanei (ἀποκαθιστάνει, 'restores') indicates comprehensive restoration—Elijah's forerunner ministry would prepare hearts for Messiah. John the Baptist fulfilled this role, calling Israel to repentance (Mark 1:4). Jesus then asks, 'how it is written of the Son of man, that he must suffer many things, and be set at nought?' (πῶς γέγραπται ἐπὶ τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ ἀνθρώπου ἵνα πολλὰ πάθῃ καὶ ἐξουδενηθῇ;). This juxtaposes restoration with suffering—both are scripturally necessary. Isaiah 53 prophesies the suffering servant 'despised and rejected' (exoudenēthē, ἐξουδενηθῇ). Jesus teaches that Messiah's glory comes through suffering, not despite it. The 'must' (hina, ἵνα, expressing divine purpose) indicates suffering isn't accidental but central to redemptive plan. Reformed theology emphasizes Christ's passive and active obedience—suffering God's wrath (passive) and perfectly obeying (active) to accomplish salvation.