Galatians 3:21

Analysis & Commentary

Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. Paul anticipates another objection: 'Is the law then against the promises of God?' (ho oun nomos kata tōn epangeliōn tou theou, ὁ οὖν νόμος κατὰ τῶν ἐπαγγελιῶν τοῦ θεοῦ)—if the Law can't justify and is inferior to the promise, does this pit Law against promise? Paul's emphatic answer: 'God forbid' (mē genoito, μὴ γένοιτο)—'May it never be!' The strongest negation in Greek. The Law and promise serve different purposes; they're not contradictory but complementary.

The conditional statement: 'for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law' (ei gar edothē nomos ho dynamenos zōopoiēsai, ontōs ek nomou an ēn hē dikaiosynē, εἰ γὰρ ἐδόθη νόμος ὁ δυνάμενος ζωοποιῆσαι, ὄντως ἐκ νόμου ἂν ἦν ἡ δικαιοσύνη). The participle 'could have given life' (dynamenos zōopoiēsai, δυνάμενος ζωοποιῆσαι)—'able to make alive'—reveals the issue: the Law lacks life-giving power. The adverb 'verily' (ontōs, ὄντως)—'truly, really'—stresses that *if* the Law could give life, righteousness would indeed come from Law.

But the contrary-to-fact conditional proves the Law cannot give life. Romans 8:3 states why: 'what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son...' The Law is holy and good (Romans 7:12), but powerless to impart life because of human sinfulness. The Law reveals sin, condemns sin, but cannot save from sin. Only the promise, fulfilled in Christ, gives life. Therefore, Law and promise work in concert: Law exposes our need; promise meets our need.

Historical Context

Jewish theology revered the Torah as the source of life (Deuteronomy 30:19-20, 32:46-47; Psalm 119:93; Proverbs 4:4), but misunderstood this to mean Torah-obedience produced life/righteousness. Paul agrees the Torah *promised* life (Leviticus 18:5, Galatians 3:12), but insists no one achieved it because no one kept the whole Law. The Torah cannot 'give life' (zōopoiēsai)—impart spiritual life and righteousness—because of human sinfulness. Only the Spirit, received through the promise by faith (v. 14), gives life (John 6:63, 2 Corinthians 3:6).

Questions for Reflection

• How does verse 21 clarify that the Law and the promise are not contradictory but serve different (complementary) purposes in God's plan?
• Why is the Law unable to 'give life' (<em>zōopoiēsai</em>) and produce righteousness, despite being holy and good?
• In what ways might you be expecting the Law (moral effort, religious duty) to give you life and righteousness, rather than looking to the life-giving promise of the Spirit through faith?