There is one alone, and there is not a second; yea, he hath neither child nor brother: yet is there no end of all his labour; neither is his eye satisfied with riches; neither saith he, For whom do I labour, and bereave my soul of good? This is also vanity, yea, it is a sore travail.
There is one alone, and there is not a second—isolation defined: echad (אֶחָד, one) with ein sheni (אֵין שֵׁנִי, no companion). Yea, he hath neither child nor brother—no family connections or heirs. Yet there is no end of all his labour—ein ketz le-khol amalo (אֵין קֵץ לְכָל־עֲמָלוֹ), endless toil accumulating wealth with no one to share or inherit it.
Neither is his eye satisfied with riches—gam-eino lo-tisba osher (גַּם־עֵינוֹ לֹא־תִשְׂבַּע עֹשֶׁר), insatiable greed drives perpetual labor. The climactic question: For whom do I labour, and bereave my soul of good? This person never asks the obvious question until too late. Working endlessly, accumulating compulsively, denying present enjoyment, all for no one—This is also vanity, yea, it is a sore travail (hevel hu ve-inyan ra hu, הֶבֶל הוּא וְעִנְיָן רָע הוּא).
The passage diagnoses workaholism and compulsive accumulation's futility. Without relationships, even great wealth proves worthless. Jesus's parable of the rich fool (Luke 12:16-21) echoes this—the man who builds bigger barns dies that night, leaving everything to others. Paul warns against greed as idolatry (Colossians 3:5).
Historical Context
Ancient Near Eastern societies valued family continuity—sons inherited property, carried on the name, provided for parents in old age. Dying childless represented profound tragedy (Deuteronomy 25:5-10). Yet some pursued wealth so obsessively that relationships withered. The isolated miser appeared in ancient literature as a cautionary figure—Egyptian instructions warned against hoarding at relationships' expense. Greco-Roman philosophy (Epicurus, Stoics) discussed the folly of accumulation without enjoyment. However, Ecclesiastes adds theological depth: humans are made for community (Genesis 2:18), and isolated accumulation violates created purpose. Monastic movements sometimes erred toward isolation, but Reformed theology emphasized vocation within community—work serves others and glorifies God.
Questions for Reflection
What pursuits are you engaging that might be 'bereaving your soul of good'—sacrificing present relationships and joy for future accumulation?
If you asked yourself honestly, 'For whom do I labour?'—what answer would emerge, and does it align with eternal priorities?
Analysis & Commentary
There is one alone, and there is not a second—isolation defined: echad (אֶחָד, one) with ein sheni (אֵין שֵׁנִי, no companion). Yea, he hath neither child nor brother—no family connections or heirs. Yet there is no end of all his labour—ein ketz le-khol amalo (אֵין קֵץ לְכָל־עֲמָלוֹ), endless toil accumulating wealth with no one to share or inherit it.
Neither is his eye satisfied with riches—gam-eino lo-tisba osher (גַּם־עֵינוֹ לֹא־תִשְׂבַּע עֹשֶׁר), insatiable greed drives perpetual labor. The climactic question: For whom do I labour, and bereave my soul of good? This person never asks the obvious question until too late. Working endlessly, accumulating compulsively, denying present enjoyment, all for no one—This is also vanity, yea, it is a sore travail (hevel hu ve-inyan ra hu, הֶבֶל הוּא וְעִנְיָן רָע הוּא).
The passage diagnoses workaholism and compulsive accumulation's futility. Without relationships, even great wealth proves worthless. Jesus's parable of the rich fool (Luke 12:16-21) echoes this—the man who builds bigger barns dies that night, leaving everything to others. Paul warns against greed as idolatry (Colossians 3:5).