Matthew 22:45

Authorized King James Version

PDF

If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?

Original Language Analysis

εἰ If G1487
εἰ If
Strong's: G1487
Word #: 1 of 10
if, whether, that, etc
οὖν then G3767
οὖν then
Strong's: G3767
Word #: 2 of 10
(adverbially) certainly, or (conjunctionally) accordingly
Δαβὶδ David G1138
Δαβὶδ David
Strong's: G1138
Word #: 3 of 10
david, the israelite king
καλεῖ call G2564
καλεῖ call
Strong's: G2564
Word #: 4 of 10
to "call" (properly, aloud, but used in a variety of applications, directly or otherwise)
αὐτοῦ him G846
αὐτοῦ him
Strong's: G846
Word #: 5 of 10
the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative g1438) of the third person, and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons
κύριον Lord G2962
κύριον Lord
Strong's: G2962
Word #: 6 of 10
supreme in authority, i.e., (as noun) controller; by implication, master (as a respectful title)
πῶς how G4459
πῶς how
Strong's: G4459
Word #: 7 of 10
an interrogative particle of manner; in what way? (sometimes the question is indirect, how?); also as exclamation, how much!
υἱὸς son G5207
υἱὸς son
Strong's: G5207
Word #: 8 of 10
a "son" (sometimes of animals), used very widely of immediate, remote or figuratively, kinship
αὐτοῦ him G846
αὐτοῦ him
Strong's: G846
Word #: 9 of 10
the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative g1438) of the third person, and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other persons
ἐστιν is he G2076
ἐστιν is he
Strong's: G2076
Word #: 10 of 10
he (she or it) is; also (with neuter plural) they are

Analysis & Commentary

If David then call him Lord, how is he his son? (εἰ οὖν Δαυὶδ καλεῖ αὐτὸν κύριον, πῶς υἱὸς αὐτοῦ ἐστιν;/ei oun Dauid kalei auton kyrion, pōs huios autou estin?) Jesus's question creates apparent paradox requiring theological resolution. The conditional 'if' (εἰ/ei) assumes the premise is true—David does call Messiah Lord in Psalm 110:1. Given this, how (πῶς/pōs) can Messiah simultaneously be David's son (υἱὸς αὐτοῦ/huios autou)? The question demands explanation of the relationship between Messiah's human descent and divine lordship.

The Pharisees cannot answer (verse 46). Their messianic theology is too small, too earthbound, too merely human. They expect political deliverer, military conqueror, earthly king restoring Israel's glory—but not God incarnate. The incarnation alone solves Jesus's riddle: Christ is David's son according to the flesh (Romans 1:3, Matthew 1:1), born of Mary in Davidic lineage, and David's Lord according to deity (Romans 9:5), the eternal Son of God who took on human nature. This mystery, which Pharisees couldn't comprehend, becomes the cornerstone of Christian confession—Jesus is fully God and fully man, one person with two natures.

Historical Context

Jesus's unanswerable question silenced all opposition (verse 46). No one could explain how Messiah could be simultaneously David's descendant and David's superior without recognizing the incarnation—God becoming man. The Pharisees' silence is deafening. After this, 'neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions' (verse 46). Jesus had systematically defeated every hostile faction: Herodians and Pharisees on taxation (verses 15-22), Sadducees on resurrection (verses 23-33), Pharisaic lawyer on the greatest commandment (verses 34-40), and finally all Pharisees on Messiah's identity (verses 41-46). His superior wisdom and authority were undeniable. Unable to defeat Him in debate, they would resort to false accusations and political manipulation to secure His crucifixion.

Questions for Reflection

Related Resources

Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.

Topics

People

Study Resources