For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. Paul explains verse 2's shocking claim. "For I testify again" (martyromai de palin, μαρτύρομαι δὲ πάλιν)—I solemnly witness, I testify as under oath. "To every man that is circumcised" (panti anthrōpō peritemnomenō)—to any person undergoing circumcision for righteousness. "That he is a debtor" (hoti opheiletēs estin, ὅτι ὀφειλέτης ἐστίν)—he becomes obligated, indebted.
"To do the whole law" (holon ton nomon poiēsai, ὅλον τὸν νόμον ποιῆσαι)—to perform, accomplish the entire law. Circumcision was entry into Torah covenant obligation. Accept one command as necessary for righteousness, you're obligated to keep all 613 commands perfectly (James 2:10). The law is package deal, not buffet. You can't cherry-pick circumcision while ignoring the rest. And since perfect law-keeping is impossible (except Christ), choosing law means choosing condemnation. The Judaizers promised the Galatians maturity through circumcision; Paul shows they're promising slavery to impossible burden ending in curse (3:10).
Historical Context
The Mosaic law comprised 613 commands (rabbinically identified) covering all life areas. Circumcision was the covenant sign (Genesis 17), marking entry into Torah obligation. Proselytes to Judaism underwent circumcision committing to Torah observance. Paul's point: you can't accept circumcision for righteousness while ignoring Sabbath, dietary laws, sacrifices, festivals, etc. The Judaizers apparently presented circumcision as the key requirement, downplaying the law's full scope. Paul exposes this inconsistency: it's all or nothing. And "all" is impossible, leaving only condemnation.
Questions for Reflection
Have you recognized that accepting any work as necessary for righteousness obligates you to perfect obedience in everything?
How do you respond to religious teaching that emphasizes certain commands while ignoring others as somehow less binding?
What does it mean practically that law is a package deal—either accept all its obligations or none as means of righteousness?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. Paul explains verse 2's shocking claim. "For I testify again" (martyromai de palin, μαρτύρομαι δὲ πάλιν)—I solemnly witness, I testify as under oath. "To every man that is circumcised" (panti anthrōpō peritemnomenō)—to any person undergoing circumcision for righteousness. "That he is a debtor" (hoti opheiletēs estin, ὅτι ὀφειλέτης ἐστίν)—he becomes obligated, indebted.
"To do the whole law" (holon ton nomon poiēsai, ὅλον τὸν νόμον ποιῆσαι)—to perform, accomplish the entire law. Circumcision was entry into Torah covenant obligation. Accept one command as necessary for righteousness, you're obligated to keep all 613 commands perfectly (James 2:10). The law is package deal, not buffet. You can't cherry-pick circumcision while ignoring the rest. And since perfect law-keeping is impossible (except Christ), choosing law means choosing condemnation. The Judaizers promised the Galatians maturity through circumcision; Paul shows they're promising slavery to impossible burden ending in curse (3:10).