If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them:
If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son—The Hebrew ben sorer u-moreh ("stubborn and rebellious son") describes persistent, incorrigible defiance, not childhood disobedience. Sorer derives from sur (to turn aside, rebel), while moreh means contentious, rebellious. This is covenant-breaking within the family structure.
Which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother—Both parents must agree, preventing unilateral parental tyranny. The phrase lo yishma ("will not obey," literally "will not hear") indicates deliberate rejection of parental authority. When they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them—Yisru (chastened/disciplined) shows corrective measures have been attempted and failed. This isn't impulsive punishment but a last resort after exhausted remediation.
This severe law (verses 18-21) protected the covenant community from corruption by removing unrepentant rebels. Rabbinic tradition notes no historical record of this sentence being carried out—its existence as law deterred the behavior. Hebrews 12:9 references respect for earthly fathers who discipline, contrasting earthly and heavenly fatherhood.
Historical Context
Ancient Israelite society was structured around the family unit as the basic covenant community. A son who utterly rejected parental authority threatened not just his family but the entire social and religious order. The requirement that both parents agree and bring the case to the elders (verse 19) created multiple safeguards against abuse. The public nature of the trial and execution served as a powerful deterrent. This law presumes a son old enough for moral accountability yet still under parental authority—likely a young adult, as the accusations in verse 20 (gluttony, drunkenness) suggest independent behavior that impacts the community.
Questions for Reflection
How does the requirement for both parents to agree and for community elders to judge reflect God's wisdom in balancing parental authority with protection against abuse of power?
What does this severe law reveal about the seriousness of rebellion against God-ordained authority, and how does it magnify the grace of the gospel that transforms rebels into sons?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son—The Hebrew ben sorer u-moreh ("stubborn and rebellious son") describes persistent, incorrigible defiance, not childhood disobedience. Sorer derives from sur (to turn aside, rebel), while moreh means contentious, rebellious. This is covenant-breaking within the family structure.
Which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother—Both parents must agree, preventing unilateral parental tyranny. The phrase lo yishma ("will not obey," literally "will not hear") indicates deliberate rejection of parental authority. When they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them—Yisru (chastened/disciplined) shows corrective measures have been attempted and failed. This isn't impulsive punishment but a last resort after exhausted remediation.
This severe law (verses 18-21) protected the covenant community from corruption by removing unrepentant rebels. Rabbinic tradition notes no historical record of this sentence being carried out—its existence as law deterred the behavior. Hebrews 12:9 references respect for earthly fathers who discipline, contrasting earthly and heavenly fatherhood.