And Joshua, and all Israel with him, took Achan the son of Zerah, and the silver, and the garment, and the wedge of gold, and his sons, and his daughters, and his oxen, and his asses, and his sheep, and his tent, and all that he had: and they brought them unto the valley of Achor.
Joshua and all Israel take Achan, the stolen items, his family, livestock, tent, and possessions to the Valley of Achor. The comprehensive list—'his sons, and his daughters, and his oxen, and his asses, and his sheep, and his tent, and all that he had'—emphasizes totality. Everything connected to Achan comes under judgment. This raises difficult questions about corporate guilt and family punishment. Ancient Near Eastern practice often included family in covenant violations, viewing households as corporate units. Whether Achan's family knew of his sin or benefited from it remains unstated, but they shared his fate. The location—Valley of Achor (Emek Akor, עֵמֶק עָכוֹר—Valley of Trouble)—gains its name from this event (verse 26). The valley becomes a memorial to sin's consequences. The participation of 'all Israel' emphasizes corporate responsibility in maintaining covenant purity. The community must actively purge sin, not merely condemn it passively.
Historical Context
The Valley of Achor was located near Jericho, visible to the entire camp. Public execution served as communal catharsis and educational object lesson. Ancient covenant communities understood that tolerating known sin threatened divine blessing on the entire group. Archaeological evidence from ancient Near East confirms that family members were sometimes included in punishment for covenant violations, though this varied by culture and offense. The comprehensive destruction of Achan's possessions—including animals and tent—illustrates cherem principle: everything associated with the violation must be purged. The public nature of the judgment—all Israel present—created collective memory. Future generations would point to Valley of Achor as warning against covenant violation. This event became proverbial—'Achan, the troubler of Israel' (1 Chronicles 2:7).
Questions for Reflection
How do you understand family consequences of sin in light of individual responsibility (Ezekiel 18)?
What does the comprehensive destruction teach about sin's pervasive effects?
How should communities balance compassion with maintaining corporate holiness?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
Joshua and all Israel take Achan, the stolen items, his family, livestock, tent, and possessions to the Valley of Achor. The comprehensive list—'his sons, and his daughters, and his oxen, and his asses, and his sheep, and his tent, and all that he had'—emphasizes totality. Everything connected to Achan comes under judgment. This raises difficult questions about corporate guilt and family punishment. Ancient Near Eastern practice often included family in covenant violations, viewing households as corporate units. Whether Achan's family knew of his sin or benefited from it remains unstated, but they shared his fate. The location—Valley of Achor (Emek Akor, עֵמֶק עָכוֹר—Valley of Trouble)—gains its name from this event (verse 26). The valley becomes a memorial to sin's consequences. The participation of 'all Israel' emphasizes corporate responsibility in maintaining covenant purity. The community must actively purge sin, not merely condemn it passively.