Job 15:25

For he stretcheth out his hand against God, and strengtheneth himself against the Almighty.

Word-by-Word Analysis

כִּֽי

H3588

(by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below); often largely modified by other particles annexed

נָטָ֣ה

H5186

For he stretcheth out

to stretch or spread out; by implication, to bend away (including moral deflection); used in a great variety of application (as follows)

אֶל

H413

near, with or among; often in general, to

אֵ֣ל

H410

against God

strength; as adjective, mighty; especially the almighty (but used also of any deity)

יָד֑וֹ

H3027

his hand

a hand (the open one [indicating power, means, direction, etc.], in distinction from h3709, the closed one); used (as noun, adverb, etc.) in a great v

וְאֶל

H413

near, with or among; often in general, to

שַׁ֝דַּ֗י

H7706

himself against the Almighty

the almighty

יִתְגַּבָּֽר׃

H1396

and strengtheneth

to be strong; by implication, to prevail, act insolently

Analysis

This verse develops the salvation theme central to Job. The concept of divine sovereignty reflects the development of salvation within biblical theology. The divine name or title here functions within biblical literature contributing to the canon's theological witness to establish theological authority and covenantal relationship. The original language emphasizes careful word choice that would have carried specific theological weight for the original audience, providing deeper understanding of the author's theological intention.

Historical Context

The literary and historical milieu of the literary conventions and historical circumstances of biblical literature shapes this text's meaning. The historical development of salvation within the theological tradition of Job Understanding the ancient worldview that shaped the author's theological expression helps modern readers appreciate why the author emphasizes divine sovereignty in this particular way.

Questions for Reflection

In what ways does understanding divine sovereignty in its original context challenge or deepen contemporary Christian thinking about salvation?
How might the original audience's understanding of divine sovereignty differ from modern interpretations, and what bridges can be built between ancient meaning and contemporary application?
What practical applications emerge from understanding salvation as presented in this verse, particularly in light of addressing questions of religious pluralism and the exclusivity of Christ?