Job 1:22

Authorized King James Version

In all this Job sinned not, nor charged God foolishly.

Word-by-Word Analysis

בְּכָל

H3605

properly, the whole; hence, all, any or every (in the singular only, but often in a plural sense)

זֹ֖את

H2063

this (often used adverb)

לֹֽא

H3808

not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles

חָטָ֣א

H2398

sinned

properly, to miss; hence (figuratively and generally) to sin; by inference, to forfeit, lack, expiate, repent, (causatively) lead astray, condemn

אִיּ֑וֹב

H347

In all this Job

ijob, the patriarch famous for his patience

וְלֹֽא

H3808

not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles

נָתַ֥ן

H5414

not nor charged

to give, used with greatest latitude of application (put, make, etc.)

תִּפְלָ֖ה

H8604

foolishly

frivolity

לֵֽאלֹהִֽים׃

H430

God

gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme god; occasionally applied by way of

Analysis

This verse develops the salvation theme central to Job. The concept of divine sovereignty reflects the development of salvation within biblical theology. The divine name or title here functions within biblical literature contributing to the canon's theological witness to establish theological authority and covenantal relationship. The original language emphasizes careful word choice that would have carried specific theological weight for the original audience, providing deeper understanding of the author's theological intention.

Historical Context

The literary and historical milieu of the literary conventions and historical circumstances of biblical literature shapes this text's meaning. The historical development of salvation within the theological tradition of Job Understanding the ancient worldview that shaped the author's theological expression helps modern readers appreciate why the author emphasizes divine sovereignty in this particular way.

Questions for Reflection

In what ways does understanding divine sovereignty in its original context challenge or deepen contemporary Christian thinking about salvation?
How does this passage contribute to our understanding of from physical deliverance in the Old Testament to spiritual redemption in the New, and what implications does this have for Christian discipleship?
How might the original audience's understanding of divine sovereignty differ from modern interpretations, and what bridges can be built between ancient meaning and contemporary application?