This verse proclaims a glorious paradox: 'For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.' The perfect tense 'hath perfected' (teteleiōken) indicates completed action with permanent results. 'For ever' (eis to diēnekes) emphasizes eternity. Yet 'them that are sanctified' uses present passive participle (tous hagiazomenous), indicating ongoing process. How are believers both perfected (complete) and being sanctified (incomplete)? The solution is forensic justification (declared righteous, positionally perfect before God) and progressive sanctification (becoming holy practically). Christ's 'one offering' (mia prosphora) contrasts with repeated Levitical sacrifices (10:11). His single sacrifice achieves eternal, complete redemption. Reformed theology distinguishes justification (instantaneous, complete, unchanging) from sanctification (lifelong, progressive, incomplete until glorification).
Historical Context
The contrast between Christ's single, sufficient sacrifice and priests' repeated, insufficient sacrifices (10:1-3, 11) demonstrates new covenant superiority. Old Testament sacrifices couldn't 'make the comers thereunto perfect' (10:1), only covering sin temporarily. Christ's sacrifice removes sin permanently (10:10). Jewish readers tempted to return to temple worship needed assurance that Christ's work was final and superior. The temple's destruction vindicated this—no more sacrifices possible. Early church fathers emphasized the finished work of Christ against heresies requiring additional works for salvation. The Reformation's great battle cry, 'sola fide' (faith alone), rests on Christ's completed, perfect work. No human additions can improve His sacrifice.
Questions for Reflection
How does understanding that Christ's one offering perfected believers forever affect your assurance of salvation?
If you're already perfected in God's sight, why is progressive sanctification still necessary?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
This verse proclaims a glorious paradox: 'For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.' The perfect tense 'hath perfected' (teteleiōken) indicates completed action with permanent results. 'For ever' (eis to diēnekes) emphasizes eternity. Yet 'them that are sanctified' uses present passive participle (tous hagiazomenous), indicating ongoing process. How are believers both perfected (complete) and being sanctified (incomplete)? The solution is forensic justification (declared righteous, positionally perfect before God) and progressive sanctification (becoming holy practically). Christ's 'one offering' (mia prosphora) contrasts with repeated Levitical sacrifices (10:11). His single sacrifice achieves eternal, complete redemption. Reformed theology distinguishes justification (instantaneous, complete, unchanging) from sanctification (lifelong, progressive, incomplete until glorification).