This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? Paul reduces his argument to a single devastating question. 'This only' (touto monon, τοῦτο μόνον) strips away all complexity—answer this one thing. The verb 'received' (elabete, ἐλάβετε) is aorist, pointing to their definitive conversion experience when they received the Holy Spirit.
'The works of the law' (ex ergōn nomou, ἐξ ἔργων νόμου) versus 'the hearing of faith' (ex akoēs pisteōs, ἐξ ἀκοῆς πίστεως)—two mutually exclusive sources. The genitive pisteōs could mean 'the message that calls for faith' or 'the hearing that produces faith,' both true. Paul appeals to their undeniable experience: they received the Spirit when they believed the gospel, not when they performed Law-works. This experiential argument demolishes legalism—the Spirit came through faith alone.
The question anticipates only one answer. Their reception of the Spirit, likely marked by charismatic phenomena (Acts 14:3), authenticated the gospel of grace Paul preached. To now require Law-keeping contradicts the Spirit's own testimony to faith-righteousness.
Historical Context
The Galatian Christians' reception of the Holy Spirit at conversion (likely accompanied by miraculous signs per Acts 14:3) was undeniable evidence that God accepted them through faith alone, without requiring circumcision or Torah observance. This same argument would be decisive at the Jerusalem Council, where Peter appeals to the Spirit's falling on Cornelius as proof God accepts uncircumcised Gentiles (Acts 15:8). Paul's logic: if God gave the Spirit to begin the Christian life by faith, why would He require works to continue it?
Questions for Reflection
Can you identify the moment you received the Holy Spirit? What role did your works play versus God's grace through faith?
How does the Spirit's presence in your life provide ongoing evidence that you are justified by faith, not works?
In what areas might you be trying to 'maintain' your salvation through religious performance rather than continuing in faith as you began?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? Paul reduces his argument to a single devastating question. 'This only' (touto monon, τοῦτο μόνον) strips away all complexity—answer this one thing. The verb 'received' (elabete, ἐλάβετε) is aorist, pointing to their definitive conversion experience when they received the Holy Spirit.
'The works of the law' (ex ergōn nomou, ἐξ ἔργων νόμου) versus 'the hearing of faith' (ex akoēs pisteōs, ἐξ ἀκοῆς πίστεως)—two mutually exclusive sources. The genitive pisteōs could mean 'the message that calls for faith' or 'the hearing that produces faith,' both true. Paul appeals to their undeniable experience: they received the Spirit when they believed the gospel, not when they performed Law-works. This experiential argument demolishes legalism—the Spirit came through faith alone.
The question anticipates only one answer. Their reception of the Spirit, likely marked by charismatic phenomena (Acts 14:3), authenticated the gospel of grace Paul preached. To now require Law-keeping contradicts the Spirit's own testimony to faith-righteousness.