Matthew 26:62
A focused desk for reading, commentary, cross-references, original language notes, and your own observations.
Matthew 26:62
62 And the high priest arose, and said unto him, Answerest thou nothing? what is it which these witness against thee?
Chapter Context
Matthew 26 is a biographical gospel chapter in the New Testament that explores themes of covenant, love, righteousness. Written during the late first century CE (c. 80-90 CE), this chapter should be understood within its historical context: Written when Christianity was separating from Judaism following Jerusalem's destruction.
The chapter can be divided into several sections:
- Verses 1-5: Introduction and setting the context
- Verses 6-12: Development of key themes
- Verses 13-20: Central message and teachings
- Verses 21-75: Conclusion and application
This chapter is significant because it contributes to the biblical metanarrative of redemption. When studying this passage, it's important to consider both its immediate context within Matthew and its broader place in the scriptural canon.
Verse Study
Matthew 26:62
62 And the high priest arose, and said unto him, Answerest thou nothing? what is it which these witness against thee?
Analysis
And the high priest arose, and said unto him, Answerest thou nothing? what is it which these witness against thee? (καὶ ἀναστὰς ὁ ἀρχιερεὺς εἶπεν αὐτῷ, Οὐδὲν ἀποκρίνῃ; τί οὗτοί σου καταμαρτυροῦσιν;)—The participle ἀνίστημι (anistēmi, 'to stand up, to rise') shows the high priest rising, emphasizing the moment's gravity. The double question presses Jesus: Οὐδὲν ἀποκρίνῃ; ('You answer nothing?') and τί οὗτοί σου καταμαρτυροῦσιν; ('What are these testifying against you?'). The verb καταμαρτυρέω (katamartureō, 'to testify against, to witness against') shows accusatory testimony. Caiaphas expected self-defense, justification, explanation—anything to provide grounds for condemnation.
Jesus's silence fulfilled Isaiah 53:7: 'As a sheep before its shearers is silent, so He opened not His mouth.' He refused to dignify false charges with response. Silence demonstrated innocence—guilty defendants frantically defend themselves; Jesus rested in the Father's vindication. His silence also modeled non-retaliation (1 Peter 2:23): 'When He was reviled, He did not revile in return; when He suffered, He did not threaten, but continued entrusting Himself to Him who judges justly.' The silent Lamb prepared for slaughter.
Historical Context
Defendants in ancient trials typically defended themselves vigorously—silence implied guilt or contempt. Caiaphas's frustration shows Jesus's silence thwarted his plans. Without self-incriminating testimony, conviction was difficult. This explains Caiaphas's next move (v. 63)—placing Jesus under oath, forcing response. Jewish law allowed judges to demand sworn testimony. Caiaphas's question 'What are these testifying against you?' shows even he recognized the witnesses' testimony was flimsy—he needed Jesus's own words for condemnation.
Reflection
- How does Jesus's silence before false accusation model trust in God's vindication rather than frantic self-defense?
- When should you remain silent rather than answering critics, trusting God to vindicate (Psalm 37:5-6)?
Cross-References
- Witness: Mark 14:60
- Parallel theme: Luke 23:9