Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey—ouk oidate hoti hō paristanete heautous doulous eis hypakoēn, douloi este hō hypakouete (οὐκ οἴδατε ὅτι ᾧ παριστάνετε ἑαυτοὺς δούλους εἰς ὑπακοήν, δοῦλοί ἐστε ᾧ ὑπακούετε). The rhetorical question assumes the principle is self-evident. Doulous (δούλους, slaves) is emphatic—total ownership and submission. Voluntary enslavement was known in Roman law (debt slavery); Paul applies the principle spiritually: whoever you obey is your master, regardless of claims to freedom.
Whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness—ētoi hamartias eis thanaton ē hypakoēs eis dikaiosynēn (ἤτοι ἁμαρτίας εἰς θάνατον ἢ ὑπακοῆς εἰς δικαιοσύνην). Two mutually exclusive slaveries, two opposite destinations: serving sin leads to death (both spiritual and eternal), serving obedience leads to righteousness (right standing and right living). Hypakoēs (ὑπακοῆς, obedience) is personified parallel to sin—obedience to God/righteousness. The destinations are inevitable consequences: sin's wages are death (v. 23), obedience's fruit is righteousness. Middle ground doesn't exist—neutrality is impossible. Everyone serves someone; the question is whom.
Historical Context
Roman slavery was ubiquitous and total: slaves had no legal personhood, no rights, no autonomy—complete subjugation to their master's will. Unlike American chattel slavery (race-based), Roman slavery resulted from conquest, debt, or birth to slaves. The metaphor would be viscerally understood. Voluntary enslavement occurred when someone sold themselves to pay debts or gain a powerful patron's protection. Paul's point: despite claims to autonomy, everyone is enslaved—either to sin or to God. True freedom is serving the right master.
Questions for Reflection
What evidence in your life reveals which master you're truly serving—sin or obedience?
How does understanding that 'neutrality' is impossible (you're always serving someone) change your view of 'small' sins?
What areas of your life need to be brought under obedience to God rather than remaining in service to sin?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey—ouk oidate hoti hō paristanete heautous doulous eis hypakoēn, douloi este hō hypakouete (οὐκ οἴδατε ὅτι ᾧ παριστάνετε ἑαυτοὺς δούλους εἰς ὑπακοήν, δοῦλοί ἐστε ᾧ ὑπακούετε). The rhetorical question assumes the principle is self-evident. Doulous (δούλους, slaves) is emphatic—total ownership and submission. Voluntary enslavement was known in Roman law (debt slavery); Paul applies the principle spiritually: whoever you obey is your master, regardless of claims to freedom.
Whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness—ētoi hamartias eis thanaton ē hypakoēs eis dikaiosynēn (ἤτοι ἁμαρτίας εἰς θάνατον ἢ ὑπακοῆς εἰς δικαιοσύνην). Two mutually exclusive slaveries, two opposite destinations: serving sin leads to death (both spiritual and eternal), serving obedience leads to righteousness (right standing and right living). Hypakoēs (ὑπακοῆς, obedience) is personified parallel to sin—obedience to God/righteousness. The destinations are inevitable consequences: sin's wages are death (v. 23), obedience's fruit is righteousness. Middle ground doesn't exist—neutrality is impossible. Everyone serves someone; the question is whom.