And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.
And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification—Paul contrasts scope: Adam's one sin brought κρίμα (krima, 'judgment/condemnation'), but Christ's gift addresses πολλῶν παραπτωμάτων (pollōn paraptōmatōn, 'many trespasses'). The free gift (χάρισμα, charisma) doesn't merely reverse one sin but conquers the accumulated transgressions of all God's people across all time.
The δικαίωμα (dikaiōma, 'justification/righteous verdict') resulting from grace surpasses the condemnation resulting from Adam's fall. The contrast emphasizes grace's triumph: one trespass brought universal condemnation, but grace overcomes not one but multitudinous sins, resulting not in mere pardon but in positive justification—a righteous verdict declaring sinners righteous in Christ.
Historical Context
This verse addresses the mathematical oddity of salvation: Adam's single sin condemns all, yet each person commits innumerable sins—how can Christ's one act of righteousness suffice? Paul's answer: the infinite value of Christ's person and work infinitely outweighs all human sin combined. Medieval theology wrestled with this through satisfaction theory (Anselm): only God-man could offer satisfaction proportionate to sin's infinite offense against infinite God. Christ's righteousness is imputed to believers, covering all their sins.
Questions for Reflection
How does the free gift addressing 'many offenses' rather than just Adam's one sin provide assurance for ongoing personal sins?
What does it mean that the outcome is 'justification' (positive verdict) rather than mere pardon (sin overlooked)?
How would you explain to someone that Christ's one act of obedience can outweigh millions of human sins?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification—Paul contrasts scope: Adam's one sin brought κρίμα (krima, 'judgment/condemnation'), but Christ's gift addresses πολλῶν παραπτωμάτων (pollōn paraptōmatōn, 'many trespasses'). The free gift (χάρισμα, charisma) doesn't merely reverse one sin but conquers the accumulated transgressions of all God's people across all time.
The δικαίωμα (dikaiōma, 'justification/righteous verdict') resulting from grace surpasses the condemnation resulting from Adam's fall. The contrast emphasizes grace's triumph: one trespass brought universal condemnation, but grace overcomes not one but multitudinous sins, resulting not in mere pardon but in positive justification—a righteous verdict declaring sinners righteous in Christ.