Psalms 2:6

Authorized King James Version

PDF

Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.

Original Language Analysis

וַ֭אֲנִי H589
וַ֭אֲנִי
Strong's: H589
Word #: 1 of 7
i
נָסַ֣כְתִּי Yet have I set H5258
נָסַ֣כְתִּי Yet have I set
Strong's: H5258
Word #: 2 of 7
to pour out, especially a libation, or to cast (metal); by analogy, to anoint a king
מַלְכִּ֑י my king H4428
מַלְכִּ֑י my king
Strong's: H4428
Word #: 3 of 7
a king
עַל H5921
עַל
Strong's: H5921
Word #: 4 of 7
above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applications
צִ֝יּ֗וֹן of Zion H6726
צִ֝יּ֗וֹן of Zion
Strong's: H6726
Word #: 5 of 7
tsijon (as a permanent capital), a mountain of jerusalem
הַר hill H2022
הַר hill
Strong's: H2022
Word #: 6 of 7
a mountain or range of hills (sometimes used figuratively)
קָדְשִֽׁי׃ upon my holy H6944
קָדְשִֽׁי׃ upon my holy
Strong's: H6944
Word #: 7 of 7
a sacred place or thing; rarely abstract, sanctity

Analysis & Commentary

This verse marks a dramatic shift—from earthly conspiracy (vv. 1-3) to God's response (vv. 4-6). The emphatic 'Yet' (wa'ani, 'but I') contrasts human plotting with divine action. Despite all earthly rebellion, God has acted decisively and unilaterally. The perfect tense nasak (set, installed, established) indicates completed action—the king's appointment is an accomplished fact, not future possibility or tentative plan.

The designation 'my king' emphasizes personal divine ownership and appointment. This is not democracy or human selection but theocratic installation. The location 'my holy hill of Zion' is doubly significant: geographically referring to Jerusalem's temple mount, theologically representing God's dwelling place and center of worship. The adjective 'holy' (qodesh) indicates separation unto God—this is sacred space where heaven and earth intersect.

Christologically, this verse prophesies Christ's exaltation and enthronement. Though crucified by earthly powers, God raised and exalted Him (Philippians 2:9-11). The heavenly Zion now represents Christ's eternal reign (Hebrews 12:22-24, Revelation 14:1). The New Jerusalem, the eschatological Zion, will be His throne forever. Human rejection cannot nullify divine appointment—a truth that sustained early Christians facing imperial persecution.

Historical Context

Zion originally referred to the Jebusite fortress David conquered, becoming the City of David and eventually synonymous with Jerusalem's temple mount. Solomon built the temple on Mount Moriah, traditionally identified with Zion, making it the focal point of Israel's worship and God's earthly presence. The phrase 'holy hill of Zion' evoked Israel's covenant relationship with Yahweh, His choice of Jerusalem as His dwelling, and the Davidic covenant promising an eternal dynasty (2 Samuel 7:12-16).

For ancient Israelites, this declaration affirmed God's sovereign choice of both king and capital despite external threats. When Assyrians, Babylonians, or other enemies threatened Jerusalem, this psalm reminded believers that God's king ruled by divine decree, not human permission. The historical David's establishment on Zion foreshadowed the greater David—Messiah—whose reign extends beyond earthly Jerusalem to encompass all creation. The early church saw Christ's resurrection as His installation as King, with Pentecost marking the beginning of His spiritual reign from the heavenly Zion.

Questions for Reflection