Matthew 9:3

Analysis & Commentary

The scribes' internal objection—'This man blasphemeth' (ουτος βλασφημει/houtos blasphēmei)—is theologically astute. Blasphemy (βλασφημια) means speaking against God's character or usurping divine prerogatives. Only God can forgive sins, as sins are ultimately offenses against God (Psalm 51:4). The scribes correctly identify Jesus' claim to forgive as a divine prerogative. Their error lies not in theology but in failing to recognize that Jesus IS God incarnate. They 'said within themselves' (ειπαν εν εαυτοις), thinking privately rather than speaking openly, yet Jesus perceives their thoughts (9:4). This episode demonstrates both Jesus' deity (forgiving sins) and omniscience (knowing hearts). The charge of blasphemy will resurface at Jesus' trial (26:65), when religious leaders condemn Him for the very truth they should have embraced.

Historical Context

Blasphemy carried the death penalty under Mosaic Law (Leviticus 24:16). The scribes (γραμματεις/grammateis) were professional Torah scholars who copied, interpreted, and taught Scripture. They held significant religious authority and would have been deeply troubled by any violation of monotheism or divine honor. In Second Temple Judaism, forgiveness came through temple sacrifices and priestly mediation. For someone outside the priesthood to pronounce forgiveness, bypassing the sacrificial system, challenged fundamental religious structures. The scribes' concern about blasphemy reflects genuine theological vigilance, though tragically misdirected.

Questions for Reflection

• How does Jesus' forgiveness of sins demonstrate His deity?
• Why is forgiveness ultimately a divine rather than human prerogative?
• What does this passage teach about the relationship between physical healing and spiritual forgiveness?