And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the high priest's, and smote off his ear.
And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the high priest's, and smote off his ear (καὶ ἰδοὺ εἷς τῶν μετὰ Ἰησοῦ ἐκτείνας τὴν χεῖρα ἀπέσπασεν τὴν μάχαιραν αὐτοῦ καὶ πατάξας τὸν δοῦλον τοῦ ἀρχιερέως ἀφεῖλεν αὐτοῦ τὸ ὠτίον)—John 18:10 identifies 'one of them' as Peter and the servant as Malchus. The verb ἀποσπάω (apospaō, 'to draw away, to unsheathe') shows Peter drew his μάχαιρα (short sword). The blow ἀφαιρέω τὸ ὠτίον ('cut off the ear') was violent but ineffective—Peter aimed for the head but only got the ear. Luke 22:51 records Jesus healing the ear, demonstrating mercy even during His arrest.
Peter's violent response reveals misunderstanding of Jesus's mission—he fought to prevent what must happen. Well-intentioned but misguided, Peter's action would have made Jesus's followers insurrectionists, justifying Rome's brutal response. Jesus had to rebuke him (v. 52) and undo the damage (healing Malchus). Fleshly zeal without spiritual understanding creates disasters. Peter's impulsive violence contrasts with Jesus's controlled submission—showing the difference between human effort and divine obedience.
Historical Context
Peter's sword (μάχαιρα) was likely a short blade, possibly for self-defense while traveling. Jesus had told them to buy swords (Luke 22:36-38), but when Peter used his, Jesus rebuked him—the swords were for fulfilling prophecy ('numbered with transgressors,' Isaiah 53:12), not actual combat. Malchus (Μάλχος, probably 'king' or 'counselor') was the high priest's servant, possibly Caiaphas's personal attendant. Peter's attack on the high priest's servant could have resulted in execution—Jesus's healing protected Peter from legal consequences.
Questions for Reflection
When have you, like Peter, fought in the flesh against what God was accomplishing through suffering?
How does Jesus's healing of His enemy's servant (Malchus) model loving enemies even while they attack you?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the high priest's, and smote off his ear (καὶ ἰδοὺ εἷς τῶν μετὰ Ἰησοῦ ἐκτείνας τὴν χεῖρα ἀπέσπασεν τὴν μάχαιραν αὐτοῦ καὶ πατάξας τὸν δοῦλον τοῦ ἀρχιερέως ἀφεῖλεν αὐτοῦ τὸ ὠτίον)—John 18:10 identifies 'one of them' as Peter and the servant as Malchus. The verb ἀποσπάω (apospaō, 'to draw away, to unsheathe') shows Peter drew his μάχαιρα (short sword). The blow ἀφαιρέω τὸ ὠτίον ('cut off the ear') was violent but ineffective—Peter aimed for the head but only got the ear. Luke 22:51 records Jesus healing the ear, demonstrating mercy even during His arrest.
Peter's violent response reveals misunderstanding of Jesus's mission—he fought to prevent what must happen. Well-intentioned but misguided, Peter's action would have made Jesus's followers insurrectionists, justifying Rome's brutal response. Jesus had to rebuke him (v. 52) and undo the damage (healing Malchus). Fleshly zeal without spiritual understanding creates disasters. Peter's impulsive violence contrasts with Jesus's controlled submission—showing the difference between human effort and divine obedience.