The Son of man indeed goeth, as it is written of him: but woe to that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! good were it for that man if he had never been born.
The Son of man indeed goeth, as it is written of him (ὁ μὲν υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου ὑπάγει καθὼς γέγραπται περὶ αὐτοῦ, ho men huios tou anthrōpou hypagei kathōs gegraptai peri autou)—Jesus affirms His death fulfills Scripture (Isaiah 53, Psalm 22, etc.). "Son of man" (υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου) from Daniel 7:13-14 identifies Jesus as the messianic figure receiving eternal dominion. But woe to that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed (οὐαὶ δὲ τῷ ἀνθρώπῳ ἐκείνῳ, ouai de tō anthrōpō ekeinō)—"woe" pronounces divine judgment.
Good were it for that man if he had never been born (καλὸν αὐτῷ εἰ οὐκ ἐγεννήθη ὁ ἄνθρωπος ἐκεῖνος, kalon autō ei ouk egennēthē ho anthrōpos ekeinos)—this severe statement affirms eternal judgment worse than non-existence. Jesus holds together divine sovereignty ("as it is written") and human responsibility ("woe to that man"). Judas wasn't a puppet—he freely chose betrayal and bears full guilt. Yet his evil served God's redemptive purpose. Reformed theology sees here the mystery of providence: God ordains ends and means without violating human agency or excusing sin. Judas's judgment warns that intimate religious proximity without genuine faith leads to damnation.
Historical Context
Jesus's prediction that He "goeth" uses the prophetic present—His death was certain, fulfilling Old Testament prophecy. Isaiah 53 (suffering servant), Psalm 22 (crucifixion details), Zechariah 11:12-13 (thirty pieces of silver), and other texts foretold Messiah's suffering. Yet prophecy didn't excuse Judas—he acted from greed and free will. Early church fathers debated whether Judas could have repented; Matthew 27:3-5 records his remorse but not repentance unto salvation. Jesus's statement "better if he had not been born" affirms hell's reality and eternal judgment's severity—doctrines often denied in modern theology but clearly taught by Christ Himself.
Questions for Reflection
How does Jesus's statement that Scripture must be fulfilled coexist with Judas bearing full moral responsibility for betrayal?
What does Jesus's pronouncement that non-existence would be better than Judas's fate teach about hell's reality and severity?
How should the warning about Judas's judgment motivate examining whether our faith is genuine or merely external religious participation?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
The Son of man indeed goeth, as it is written of him (ὁ μὲν υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου ὑπάγει καθὼς γέγραπται περὶ αὐτοῦ, ho men huios tou anthrōpou hypagei kathōs gegraptai peri autou)—Jesus affirms His death fulfills Scripture (Isaiah 53, Psalm 22, etc.). "Son of man" (υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου) from Daniel 7:13-14 identifies Jesus as the messianic figure receiving eternal dominion. But woe to that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed (οὐαὶ δὲ τῷ ἀνθρώπῳ ἐκείνῳ, ouai de tō anthrōpō ekeinō)—"woe" pronounces divine judgment.
Good were it for that man if he had never been born (καλὸν αὐτῷ εἰ οὐκ ἐγεννήθη ὁ ἄνθρωπος ἐκεῖνος, kalon autō ei ouk egennēthē ho anthrōpos ekeinos)—this severe statement affirms eternal judgment worse than non-existence. Jesus holds together divine sovereignty ("as it is written") and human responsibility ("woe to that man"). Judas wasn't a puppet—he freely chose betrayal and bears full guilt. Yet his evil served God's redemptive purpose. Reformed theology sees here the mystery of providence: God ordains ends and means without violating human agency or excusing sin. Judas's judgment warns that intimate religious proximity without genuine faith leads to damnation.