And if ye offer the blind for sacrifice, is it not evil? and if ye offer the lame and sick, is it not evil? offer it now unto thy governor; will he be pleased with thee, or accept thy person? saith the LORD of hosts.
And if ye offer the blind for sacrifice, is it not evil? and if ye offer the lame and sick, is it not evil? offer it now unto thy governor; will he be pleased with thee, or accept thy person? saith the LORD of hosts. God specifies the defective sacrifices: the blind (עִוֵּר, ivver), the lame (פִּסֵּחַ, pisseaḥ), and sick (חֹלֶה, ḥoleh) animals—all explicitly forbidden by Torah (Leviticus 22:20-24, Deuteronomy 15:21). The rhetorical question is it not evil? (הַאֵין רָע, ha'ein ra) emphasizes the obvious wickedness. רָע (ra) means evil, bad, wicked—not merely inappropriate but morally wrong.
God's devastating comparison follows: offer it now unto thy governor (הַקְרִיבֵהוּ נָא לְפֶחָתֶךָ, hakrivehu na lefeḥatekha). פֶּחָה (peḥah, governor) refers to the Persian governor ruling Judah. Would the priests dare offer such defective gifts to their earthly ruler? Will he be pleased with thee, or accept thy person? (הֲיִרְצְךָ אוֹ הֲיִשָּׂא פָנֶיךָ, hayirtzekha o hayissa fanekha). Obviously not—human governors demand respect; how much more the King of heaven?
This argument exposes the priests' hypocrisy: they gave human authorities what they withheld from God. They feared man more than God, valued human approval above divine favor. This reversal of priorities characterizes all false worship—using God while serving self.
Historical Context
Persian governors controlled Judah during the post-exilic period. The priests, as intermediaries between Jewish community and Persian authority, understood protocol for approaching rulers. No one would insult a governor with defective gifts—doing so risked punishment. Yet these same priests insulted the sovereign LORD with blind, lame, and sick animals. Their hypocrisy revealed distorted priorities: they feared earthly consequences but not divine judgment. Jesus confronted similar hypocrisy in religious leaders who tithed herbs while neglecting justice and mercy (Matthew 23:23), who honored God with lips while hearts remained far from Him (Matthew 15:8).
Questions for Reflection
How does comparing our worship to what we'd offer human authorities expose our true priorities?
In what areas might we fear man's disapproval more than God's, showing more respect to earthly powers than to our heavenly King?
What does it reveal about our theology when we give God less than our best while reserving excellence for other pursuits?
Analysis & Commentary
And if ye offer the blind for sacrifice, is it not evil? and if ye offer the lame and sick, is it not evil? offer it now unto thy governor; will he be pleased with thee, or accept thy person? saith the LORD of hosts. God specifies the defective sacrifices: the blind (עִוֵּר, ivver), the lame (פִּסֵּחַ, pisseaḥ), and sick (חֹלֶה, ḥoleh) animals—all explicitly forbidden by Torah (Leviticus 22:20-24, Deuteronomy 15:21). The rhetorical question is it not evil? (הַאֵין רָע, ha'ein ra) emphasizes the obvious wickedness. רָע (ra) means evil, bad, wicked—not merely inappropriate but morally wrong.
God's devastating comparison follows: offer it now unto thy governor (הַקְרִיבֵהוּ נָא לְפֶחָתֶךָ, hakrivehu na lefeḥatekha). פֶּחָה (peḥah, governor) refers to the Persian governor ruling Judah. Would the priests dare offer such defective gifts to their earthly ruler? Will he be pleased with thee, or accept thy person? (הֲיִרְצְךָ אוֹ הֲיִשָּׂא פָנֶיךָ, hayirtzekha o hayissa fanekha). Obviously not—human governors demand respect; how much more the King of heaven?
This argument exposes the priests' hypocrisy: they gave human authorities what they withheld from God. They feared man more than God, valued human approval above divine favor. This reversal of priorities characterizes all false worship—using God while serving self.