And the man, the master of the house, went out unto them, and said unto them, Nay, my brethren, nay, I pray you, do not so wickedly; seeing that this man is come into mine house, do not this folly.
And the man, the master of the house, went out unto them, and said unto them, Nay, my brethren, nay, I pray you, do not so wickedly; seeing that this man is come into mine house, do not this folly. This verse begins Gibeah's darkest hour. "The men of the city, certain sons of Belial" (v. 22) surround the house demanding to rape the Levite. The old man's response shows desperate negotiation with evil. His address "my brethren" (achai, אַחַי) appeals to common humanity and covenant membership—these are Israelites, not pagans, yet they act like Sodom's mob (Genesis 19:4-5).
His plea "do not so wickedly" (al-tare'u na, אַל־תָּרֵעוּ נָא) uses the root ra'a (רָעַע, "to do evil, act wickedly"), the same root describing human evil before the flood (Genesis 6:5). The word "folly" (nevalah, נְבָלָה) is stronger than English suggests—it denotes moral outrage, disgraceful wickedness violating community standards. The term describes rape (Genesis 34:7), sexual immorality (Deuteronomy 22:21), and sacrilege (Joshua 7:15). That such nevalah occurs in Israel, not Canaan, reveals spiritual catastrophe.
The old man's argument invokes sacred hospitality: "seeing that this man is come into mine house" (acharei asher-ba haish hazeh el-beiti, אַחֲרֵי אֲשֶׁר־בָּא הָאִישׁ הַזֶּה אֶל־בֵּיתִי). Ancient hospitality created sacred obligations—the host protected guests even at personal cost. Lot made similar arguments in Sodom (Genesis 19:8). While we rightly critique the old man's subsequent offer of women (v. 24), his initial appeal to hospitality obligations reflects legitimate moral reasoning. Tragically, "sons of Belial" recognize no moral constraints.
Historical Context
"Sons of Belial" (benei beliyaal, בְּנֵי בְלִיָּעַל) appears 27 times in the Old Testament, always describing moral reprobates. Later Jewish tradition personified Belial as a demon (2 Corinthians 6:15), but the Hebrew term means "worthlessness, wickedness." That such men dominated Gibeah shows complete moral collapse. The parallel to Sodom is deliberate—Genesis 19:4-5 describes "men of the city, even the men of Sodom" surrounding Lot's house with identical demands. Gibeah had become a second Sodom within covenant Israel, fulfilling Moses's warning that disobedience would make Israel like the nations God judged (Deuteronomy 28:15-68). The old man's appeal to hospitality obligations reflects universal ancient Near Eastern values—violating guest-host relationships provoked divine judgment (compare Greek myths of Zeus punishing hospitality violations).
Questions for Reflection
How does the existence of 'sons of Belial' within covenant Israel demonstrate that external religious identity doesn't guarantee heart transformation?
What does the old man's appeal to hospitality obligations teach about natural law and moral reasoning even in depraved cultures?
How should Christians respond when moral reasoning and appeals to conscience fail to restrain wickedness in society?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
And the man, the master of the house, went out unto them, and said unto them, Nay, my brethren, nay, I pray you, do not so wickedly; seeing that this man is come into mine house, do not this folly. This verse begins Gibeah's darkest hour. "The men of the city, certain sons of Belial" (v. 22) surround the house demanding to rape the Levite. The old man's response shows desperate negotiation with evil. His address "my brethren" (achai, אַחַי) appeals to common humanity and covenant membership—these are Israelites, not pagans, yet they act like Sodom's mob (Genesis 19:4-5).
His plea "do not so wickedly" (al-tare'u na, אַל־תָּרֵעוּ נָא) uses the root ra'a (רָעַע, "to do evil, act wickedly"), the same root describing human evil before the flood (Genesis 6:5). The word "folly" (nevalah, נְבָלָה) is stronger than English suggests—it denotes moral outrage, disgraceful wickedness violating community standards. The term describes rape (Genesis 34:7), sexual immorality (Deuteronomy 22:21), and sacrilege (Joshua 7:15). That such nevalah occurs in Israel, not Canaan, reveals spiritual catastrophe.
The old man's argument invokes sacred hospitality: "seeing that this man is come into mine house" (acharei asher-ba haish hazeh el-beiti, אַחֲרֵי אֲשֶׁר־בָּא הָאִישׁ הַזֶּה אֶל־בֵּיתִי). Ancient hospitality created sacred obligations—the host protected guests even at personal cost. Lot made similar arguments in Sodom (Genesis 19:8). While we rightly critique the old man's subsequent offer of women (v. 24), his initial appeal to hospitality obligations reflects legitimate moral reasoning. Tragically, "sons of Belial" recognize no moral constraints.