Behold, here is my daughter a maiden, and his concubine; them I will bring out now, and humble ye them, and do with them what seemeth good unto you: but unto this man do not so vile a thing.
Behold, here is my daughter a maiden, and his concubine; them I will bring out now, and humble ye them, and do with them what seemeth good unto you: but unto this man do not so vile a thing. This verse presents one of Scripture's most difficult moments. The old man offers his virgin daughter (bat habetulah, בַּת הַבְּתוּלָה) and the Levite's concubine as substitutes. The verb "humble" (anu, עַנּוּ) is the same term used for rape in Deuteronomy 22:24, 29—this is not consensual intimacy but violent sexual assault. "Do with them what seemeth good unto you" (ve'asu lahem hatov be'eineichem, וַעֲשׂוּ לָהֶם הַטּוֹב בְּעֵינֵיכֶם) horrifyingly echoes Judges' refrain "every man did that which was right in his own eyes" (17:6, 21:25).
Scripture records this offer without approving it. The parallel to Lot's similar offer in Sodom (Genesis 19:8) suggests both men valued male guests' safety over female family members—reflecting ancient patriarchy's failures. However, we must not miss the narrator's condemnation: this is nevalah (folly, moral outrage). The old man's description of homosexual rape as "so vile a thing" (davar hanevalah hazot, דְּבַר הַנְּבָלָה הַזֹּאת) while offering heterosexual rape as acceptable reveals catastrophic moral confusion.
Reformed theology affirms Scripture's inerrancy while recognizing it records human sin without endorsing it. This passage demonstrates total depravity—even relatively righteous characters (the old man showed hospitality) harbor profound moral blindness. The narrative exposes rather than excuses patriarchal culture's evil. Christ's treatment of women (John 4:7-27, Luke 8:1-3, John 8:1-11) and Paul's declaration that in Christ "there is neither male nor female" (Galatians 3:28) show the gospel's transformative power to overturn fallen cultural patterns. This text warns against selective moral outrage—condemning some sins while tolerating others.
Historical Context
Ancient Near Eastern patriarchy systematically devalued women. Daughters were property to be transferred through marriage; concubines (secondary wives) had even fewer protections. The Code of Hammurabi and other ancient law codes prescribed severe punishments for male honor violations while permitting violence against women. However, biblical law—though accommodating cultural contexts—provided greater protections: laws against rape (Deuteronomy 22:25-27), inheritance rights for daughters without brothers (Numbers 27:1-11), and equality in image-bearing (Genesis 1:27). The old man's offer, while culturally explicable, violated Torah principles. Israel's descent to Canaanite-level degradation of women demonstrates covenant apostasy's effects. The subsequent gang rape and murder (vv. 25-30) triggered civil war, killing tens of thousands—God's judgment on sin.
Questions for Reflection
How does Scripture's recording of this evil without approving it demonstrate the Bible's honesty about human depravity, including within covenant communities?
What does the old man's selective moral outrage (condemning homosexual rape while offering heterosexual rape) teach about the danger of prioritizing some biblical commands while ignoring others?
How does Christ's radical elevation of women's dignity challenge cultures (ancient and modern) that devalue female image-bearers?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
Behold, here is my daughter a maiden, and his concubine; them I will bring out now, and humble ye them, and do with them what seemeth good unto you: but unto this man do not so vile a thing. This verse presents one of Scripture's most difficult moments. The old man offers his virgin daughter (bat habetulah, בַּת הַבְּתוּלָה) and the Levite's concubine as substitutes. The verb "humble" (anu, עַנּוּ) is the same term used for rape in Deuteronomy 22:24, 29—this is not consensual intimacy but violent sexual assault. "Do with them what seemeth good unto you" (ve'asu lahem hatov be'eineichem, וַעֲשׂוּ לָהֶם הַטּוֹב בְּעֵינֵיכֶם) horrifyingly echoes Judges' refrain "every man did that which was right in his own eyes" (17:6, 21:25).
Scripture records this offer without approving it. The parallel to Lot's similar offer in Sodom (Genesis 19:8) suggests both men valued male guests' safety over female family members—reflecting ancient patriarchy's failures. However, we must not miss the narrator's condemnation: this is nevalah (folly, moral outrage). The old man's description of homosexual rape as "so vile a thing" (davar hanevalah hazot, דְּבַר הַנְּבָלָה הַזֹּאת) while offering heterosexual rape as acceptable reveals catastrophic moral confusion.
Reformed theology affirms Scripture's inerrancy while recognizing it records human sin without endorsing it. This passage demonstrates total depravity—even relatively righteous characters (the old man showed hospitality) harbor profound moral blindness. The narrative exposes rather than excuses patriarchal culture's evil. Christ's treatment of women (John 4:7-27, Luke 8:1-3, John 8:1-11) and Paul's declaration that in Christ "there is neither male nor female" (Galatians 3:28) show the gospel's transformative power to overturn fallen cultural patterns. This text warns against selective moral outrage—condemning some sins while tolerating others.