Now as they were making their hearts merry, behold, the men of the city, certain sons of Belial, beset the house round about, and beat at the door, and spake to the master of the house, the old man, saying, Bring forth the man that came into thine house, that we may know him.
Now as they were making their hearts merry, behold, the men of the city, certain sons of Belial, beset the house round about, and beat at the door, and spake to the master of the house, the old man, saying, Bring forth the man that came into thine house, that we may know him. This verse directly parallels Genesis 19:4-5, where Sodom's men surrounded Lot's house demanding to "know" (sexually abuse) his angelic guests. The phrase "sons of Belial" (benei beliyaal, בְּנֵי בְלִיָּעַל) means "worthless" or "wicked" men, emphasizing their moral depravity. That this occurs in Gibeah, a Benjamite city in covenant Israel, demonstrates how far God's people had fallen—they had become indistinguishable from Canaan's most wicked cities.
The demand to "know him" (veda'enu oto) uses the same Hebrew verb (yada, יָדַע) as Genesis 19:5, clearly indicating homosexual gang rape. This represents the nadir of Israel's moral collapse during Judges. From a Reformed perspective, this passage demonstrates total depravity and the inevitable consequences of rejecting God's moral law. When "everyone did what was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25), autonomous moral reasoning led not to enlightenment but to Sodom-like wickedness. This validates the necessity of objective, divinely-revealed moral standards and warns that covenant community status doesn't prevent moral collapse apart from genuine heart transformation.
Historical Context
Gibeah was a Benjamite city approximately three miles north of Jerusalem, later becoming King Saul's hometown (1 Samuel 10:26). Archaeological excavations at Tell el-Ful (ancient Gibeah) have revealed destruction layers from this period, possibly connected to the civil war described in Judges 20. The parallel to Sodom is deliberate—the narrator intends readers to see Israel had become like the cities God destroyed. While Sodom's wickedness brought divine judgment through fire and brimstone (Genesis 19:24-25), Israel's wickedness brought internal civil war and near-extinction of an entire tribe. The subsequent events—gang rape and murder of the concubine, Israel's shocked response, war killing 25,000 Benjamites and destroying their cities (Judges 20:35-48)—demonstrate that covenant people can fall to depths rivaling pagan nations when they abandon God's law.
Questions for Reflection
How does the parallel to Sodom demonstrate that covenant status doesn't prevent moral collapse apart from genuine faithfulness?
What does this narrative teach about the end result of moral relativism ("everyone did what was right in his own eyes")?
How should the church respond when such grievous sin occurs within the covenant community?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
Now as they were making their hearts merry, behold, the men of the city, certain sons of Belial, beset the house round about, and beat at the door, and spake to the master of the house, the old man, saying, Bring forth the man that came into thine house, that we may know him. This verse directly parallels Genesis 19:4-5, where Sodom's men surrounded Lot's house demanding to "know" (sexually abuse) his angelic guests. The phrase "sons of Belial" (benei beliyaal, בְּנֵי בְלִיָּעַל) means "worthless" or "wicked" men, emphasizing their moral depravity. That this occurs in Gibeah, a Benjamite city in covenant Israel, demonstrates how far God's people had fallen—they had become indistinguishable from Canaan's most wicked cities.
The demand to "know him" (veda'enu oto) uses the same Hebrew verb (yada, יָדַע) as Genesis 19:5, clearly indicating homosexual gang rape. This represents the nadir of Israel's moral collapse during Judges. From a Reformed perspective, this passage demonstrates total depravity and the inevitable consequences of rejecting God's moral law. When "everyone did what was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25), autonomous moral reasoning led not to enlightenment but to Sodom-like wickedness. This validates the necessity of objective, divinely-revealed moral standards and warns that covenant community status doesn't prevent moral collapse apart from genuine heart transformation.