Job 34:23
For he will not lay upon man more than right; that he should enter into judgment with God.
Original Language Analysis
כִּ֤י
H3588
כִּ֤י
Strong's:
H3588
Word #:
1 of 10
(by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below); often largely modified by other particles annexed
לֹ֣א
H3808
לֹ֣א
Strong's:
H3808
Word #:
2 of 10
not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles
עַל
H5921
עַל
Strong's:
H5921
Word #:
3 of 10
above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applications
אִ֭ישׁ
upon man
H376
אִ֭ישׁ
upon man
Strong's:
H376
Word #:
4 of 10
a man as an individual or a male person; often used as an adjunct to a more definite term (and in such cases frequently not expressed in translation)
יָשִׂ֣ים
For he will not lay
H7760
יָשִׂ֣ים
For he will not lay
Strong's:
H7760
Word #:
5 of 10
to put (used in a great variety of applications, literal, figurative, inferentially, and elliptically)
ע֑וֹד
H5750
ע֑וֹד
Strong's:
H5750
Word #:
6 of 10
properly, iteration or continuance; used only adverbially (with or without preposition), again, repeatedly, still, more
לַהֲלֹ֥ךְ
more than right that he should enter
H1980
לַהֲלֹ֥ךְ
more than right that he should enter
Strong's:
H1980
Word #:
7 of 10
to walk (in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively)
Cross References
Psalms 119:137Righteous art thou, O LORD, and upright are thy judgments.Ezra 9:13And after all that is come upon us for our evil deeds, and for our great trespass, seeing that thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve, and hast given us such deliverance as this;Isaiah 42:3A bruised reed shall he not break, and the smoking flax shall he not quench: he shall bring forth judgment unto truth.Job 16:21O that one might plead for a man with God, as a man pleadeth for his neighbour!Job 23:7There the righteous might dispute with him; so should I be delivered for ever from my judge.Job 11:11For he knoweth vain men: he seeth wickedness also; will he not then consider it?Job 11:6And that he would shew thee the secrets of wisdom, that they are double to that which is! Know therefore that God exacteth of thee less than thine iniquity deserveth.Jeremiah 2:5Thus saith the LORD, What iniquity have your fathers found in me, that they are gone far from me, and have walked after vanity, and are become vain?Romans 9:20Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?
Historical Context
Elihu's argument engages ancient Near Eastern legal concepts where disputants could challenge verdicts before higher authorities. However, Elihu insists no higher court exists above God—His judgments are final and self-justifying. This theological position counters Job's earlier demands for a mediator (9:33) or legal advocate (16:19-21). The wisdom literature tradition emphasized accepting divine sovereignty rather than demanding exhaustive explanations for suffering.
Questions for Reflection
- When has questioning God's justice actually been a disguised demand that He justify Himself to you?
- How can we distinguish between honest wrestling with God's ways (like Job) and arrogant challenging of divine authority?
- What comfort comes from knowing God never lays upon us 'more than right,' even when suffering feels overwhelming?
Analysis & Commentary
For he will not lay upon man more than right (כִּי לֹא עַל־אִישׁ יָשִׂים עוֹד)—Elihu affirms God's justice never exceeds what is appropriate. The verb yasim (to set, place, lay) with 'od (more, again) indicates God doesn't impose excessive burden. This directly addresses Job's complaint that his suffering exceeds his sin. Elihu argues God's judgments are precisely calibrated to righteousness—never arbitrary or excessive.
That he should enter into judgment with God (לַהֲלֹךְ אֶל־אֵל בַּמִּשְׁפָּט)—The infinitive construct lahalokh (to walk, to go) with el-El (unto God) pictures entering into legal proceedings. Mishpat denotes formal judgment or legal case. Elihu's point: because God's dealings are inherently just, humans need not exhaustively investigate or second-guess divine actions before submitting to judgment. This anticipates Paul's rhetorical question in Romans 9:20: 'Who art thou that repliest against God?' God's justice is self-authenticating, requiring no defense before human tribunals.