Job 21:25

Authorized King James Version

And another dieth in the bitterness of his soul, and never eateth with pleasure.

Word-by-Word Analysis

וְזֶ֗ה

H2088

the masculine demonstrative pronoun, this or that

יָ֭מוּת

H4191

And another dieth

to die (literally or figuratively); causatively, to kill

בְּנֶ֣פֶשׁ

H5315

of his soul

properly, a breathing creature, i.e., animal of (abstractly) vitality; used very widely in a literal, accommodated or figurative sense (bodily or ment

מָרָ֑ה

H4751

in the bitterness

bitter (literally or figuratively); also (as noun) bitterness, or (adverbially) bitterly

וְלֹֽא

H3808

not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles

אָ֝כַ֗ל

H398

and never eateth

to eat (literally or figuratively)

בַּטּוֹבָֽה׃

H2896

with pleasure

good (as an adjective) in the widest sense; used likewise as a noun, both in the masculine and the feminine, the singular and the plural (good, a good

Analysis

Within the broader context of Job, this passage highlights salvation through simile or metaphorical language. The theological weight of divine revelation connects to fundamental Christian doctrine about divine revelation, contributing to our understanding of God's nature and relationship with humanity. This verse contributes to the book's overall argument by building upon previous themes while advancing the overall message of Job.

Historical Context

The literary and historical milieu of the literary conventions and historical circumstances of biblical literature shapes this text's meaning. The historical development of salvation within the theological tradition of Job Understanding the ancient worldview that shaped the author's theological expression helps modern readers appreciate why the author emphasizes divine revelation in this particular way.

Questions for Reflection

How does this verse's literary context within Job chapter 21 illuminate its theological significance, and what does this teach us about biblical interpretation?
What systematic theological implications arise from this verse's treatment of salvation, and how does it contribute to a biblical theology of soteriology and the doctrine of salvation?
What practical applications emerge from understanding salvation as presented in this verse, particularly in light of addressing questions of religious pluralism and the exclusivity of Christ?