Wherefore the princes were wroth with Jeremiah, and smote him, and put him in prison in the house of Jonathan the scribe: for they had made that the prison.
Wherefore the princes were wroth with Jeremiah—their anger (qatsap, קָצַף, intense displeasure/fury) reveals predetermined hostility unrelated to evidence. They were angry at Jeremiah's message and seized the arrest as opportunity to punish him. And smote him—the Hebrew hikou (הִכּוּ, beat/struck) indicates violent assault, likely flogging. This official beating recalls the earlier assault when Pashur struck Jeremiah and put him in stocks (20:2).
And put him in prison in the house of Jonathan the scribe: for they had made that the prison—this improvised prison in beit hasofer (בֵּית הַסֹּפֵר, house of the scribe) suggests Jerusalem's regular facilities were overwhelmed or destroyed during siege conditions. Scribes were educated officials who managed administrative functions; Jonathan's house was commandeered as detention center. The phrase ki-oto asu beit hakele (כִּי־אֹתוֹ עָשׂוּ בֵּית הַכֶּלֶא, for they had made that the prison) explains this unusual arrangement.
The beating and imprisonment constitute official persecution for prophetic ministry. This pattern runs throughout Scripture: Elijah fled Jezebel's wrath, Micaiah was imprisoned for true prophecy (1 Kings 22:27), John the Baptist was beheaded, Jesus was crucified, apostles were beaten (Acts 5:40). Faithful proclamation often provokes violent opposition from those whose power or ideology is threatened by God's word (John 15:20; 2 Timothy 3:12).
Historical Context
Jerusalem's conditions during the extended siege (18 months total) were desperate. Famine, disease, and military pressure created chaos. Normal civic institutions broke down. Jonathan the scribe's house being repurposed as prison suggests official facilities were unavailable or needed for military purposes. The dungeon mentioned in verse 16 was particularly harsh—likely a cistern or underground chamber. Jeremiah's treatment contrasts sharply with Zedekiah's later private consultations (vv. 17-21), showing the king's conflicted posture: respecting the prophet privately while allowing officials to persecute him publicly.
Questions for Reflection
Why does faithful proclamation of God's word often provoke violent opposition from civil authorities?
How should we respond when officially punished for speaking biblical truth?
What does the princes' anger at Jeremiah (despite flimsy evidence) reveal about the real nature of opposition to prophetic ministry?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
Wherefore the princes were wroth with Jeremiah—their anger (qatsap, קָצַף, intense displeasure/fury) reveals predetermined hostility unrelated to evidence. They were angry at Jeremiah's message and seized the arrest as opportunity to punish him. And smote him—the Hebrew hikou (הִכּוּ, beat/struck) indicates violent assault, likely flogging. This official beating recalls the earlier assault when Pashur struck Jeremiah and put him in stocks (20:2).
And put him in prison in the house of Jonathan the scribe: for they had made that the prison—this improvised prison in beit hasofer (בֵּית הַסֹּפֵר, house of the scribe) suggests Jerusalem's regular facilities were overwhelmed or destroyed during siege conditions. Scribes were educated officials who managed administrative functions; Jonathan's house was commandeered as detention center. The phrase ki-oto asu beit hakele (כִּי־אֹתוֹ עָשׂוּ בֵּית הַכֶּלֶא, for they had made that the prison) explains this unusual arrangement.
The beating and imprisonment constitute official persecution for prophetic ministry. This pattern runs throughout Scripture: Elijah fled Jezebel's wrath, Micaiah was imprisoned for true prophecy (1 Kings 22:27), John the Baptist was beheaded, Jesus was crucified, apostles were beaten (Acts 5:40). Faithful proclamation often provokes violent opposition from those whose power or ideology is threatened by God's word (John 15:20; 2 Timothy 3:12).