For they call themselves of the holy city, and stay themselves upon the God of Israel. Isaiah exposes Israel's presumption - claiming covenant privilege without covenant obedience. The verb qara (call themselves) indicates self-designation; Israel appropriates the title "holy city" without pursuing holiness. Similarly, samach (stay, lean upon) suggests confidence in God's protection while ignoring His commandments. This is covenant nominalism - maintaining the forms while abandoning the substance.
The phrase "The LORD of hosts is his name" should ground genuine worship and obedience, yet Israel uses God's title as magical insurance rather than moral imperative. God's covenant name YHWH Tzeva'ot (LORD of hosts) emphasizes His sovereign power over all creation - which should inspire reverent obedience, not presumptuous security. Israel assumes that possessing correct theology about God substitutes for relationship with God.
From a Reformed perspective, this verse condemns dead orthodoxy - affirming truth about God while living in practical atheism. Many claim Christ's name, attend church, and affirm sound doctrine yet remain unconverted. Jesus confronted similar hypocrisy: "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom" (Matthew 7:21). True faith produces obedience; profession without transformation reveals false assurance.
Historical Context
This rebuke addresses Judah during the Babylonian exile (586-538 BC). Despite Jerusalem's destruction and temple desecration - divine judgment for covenant violation - the exiles still presumed upon God's protection based on ancestry and election. They "called themselves of the holy city" even while that city lay in ruins. This misunderstanding of unconditional election (God's choice of Israel) as unconditional preservation (immunity from judgment) persists among covenant communities who assume external identification guarantees divine favor.
Questions for Reflection
In what ways might you be 'calling yourself' by Christian identity while failing to 'stay upon' God through genuine trust and obedience?
How does presuming upon God's grace without pursuing holiness parallel Israel's error of claiming covenant privilege without covenant faithfulness?
What evidence in your life demonstrates that your profession of faith is genuine rather than merely nominal?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
For they call themselves of the holy city, and stay themselves upon the God of Israel. Isaiah exposes Israel's presumption - claiming covenant privilege without covenant obedience. The verb qara (call themselves) indicates self-designation; Israel appropriates the title "holy city" without pursuing holiness. Similarly, samach (stay, lean upon) suggests confidence in God's protection while ignoring His commandments. This is covenant nominalism - maintaining the forms while abandoning the substance.
The phrase "The LORD of hosts is his name" should ground genuine worship and obedience, yet Israel uses God's title as magical insurance rather than moral imperative. God's covenant name YHWH Tzeva'ot (LORD of hosts) emphasizes His sovereign power over all creation - which should inspire reverent obedience, not presumptuous security. Israel assumes that possessing correct theology about God substitutes for relationship with God.
From a Reformed perspective, this verse condemns dead orthodoxy - affirming truth about God while living in practical atheism. Many claim Christ's name, attend church, and affirm sound doctrine yet remain unconverted. Jesus confronted similar hypocrisy: "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom" (Matthew 7:21). True faith produces obedience; profession without transformation reveals false assurance.