Daniel 5:8
Then came in all the king's wise men: but they could not read the writing, nor make known to the king the interpretation thereof.
Original Language Analysis
Cross References
Historical Context
The wise men's failure may relate to the writing's nature. The text was likely Aramaic (Daniel's language) but perhaps written in unusual format: vertically, without vowels, abbreviated, or using archaic script. Ancient Semitic languages used consonants without vowels, allowing multiple readings depending on vowel points. The wise men may have seen the characters but couldn't determine the correct reading or meaning. This technical difficulty became divine instrument: God ensured that only His chosen interpreter (Daniel) could decode the message. The historical pattern shows how God repeatedly uses foolish things to confound the wise (1 Corinthians 1:27), demonstrating salvation and revelation come through grace, not merit.
Questions for Reflection
- What does the wise men's inability to even read the writing teach about human wisdom's limitations?
- How does God use human inadequacy to highlight His grace in granting understanding to chosen servants?
- Why does Scripture repeatedly show expert failure before divine revelation?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
Despite their expertise and promised rewards, all the king's wise men 'could not read the writing, nor make known to the king the interpretation thereof.' This failure is comprehensive: they couldn't even read the writing, much less interpret its meaning. Some scholars suggest the writing used an unknown script, archaic language, or was written in a way that made reading difficult. Others propose God sovereignly prevented their understanding. Either way, the point is clear: human wisdom fails before divine revelation. This repeated failure (chapters 2, 4, 5) establishes pattern: Babylon's vaunted intellectual tradition—astronomy, mathematics, literature—proves useless for understanding God's truth. Only those enlightened by God's Spirit (Daniel) can interpret. This vindicates biblical epistemology: natural man cannot receive spiritual things (1 Corinthians 2:14); revelation requires illumination.