Daniel 2:27
Daniel answered in the presence of the king, and said, The secret which the king hath demanded cannot the wise men, the astrologers, the magicians, the soothsayers, shew unto the king;
Original Language Analysis
Historical Context
Daniel's exhaustive listing of professional classes—wise men, astrologers, magicians, soothsayers—represented Babylon's comprehensive intellectual and religious establishment. These weren't primitive superstitions but sophisticated systems developed over centuries. Yet all failed when genuinely tested. This failure validated biblical truth: human wisdom, however refined, cannot penetrate divine mysteries. Only revelation from the true God provides genuine supernatural knowledge. This demonstration strengthened Jewish faith throughout exile and continues validating Scripture's authority against all human alternatives.
Questions for Reflection
- How does Daniel's beginning with universal human inability strategically prepare for demonstrating divine capability?
- What does his comprehensive listing of failed professional classes teach about how biblical revelation surpasses all human wisdom systems?
- In what ways does this pattern—demonstrate human bankruptcy, then divine sufficiency—model effective gospel proclamation?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
Daniel's response exemplifies humble boldness: "Daniel answered in the presence of the king, and said, The secret which the king hath demanded cannot the wise men, the astrologers, the magicians, the soothsayers, shew unto the king." He begins by affirming what everyone knows—human wisdom fails. The comprehensive list (wise men, astrologers, magicians, soothsayers) emphasizes that all categories of pagan expertise proved inadequate. Daniel doesn't boast personal superiority over these professionals but establishes that no human technique accesses such knowledge.
This response demonstrates strategic wisdom. By acknowledging universal human inability, Daniel prepares for demonstrating divine capability. He removes any suggestion that superior education, intelligence, or technique explains what follows. Only divine revelation can provide the answer. This sets up the coming demonstration that Yahweh, not Daniel, deserves glory. It also protects Daniel from appearing arrogant—he's not claiming personal superiority but serving as conduit for divine revelation.
Theologically, this models gospel proclamation. Effective witness begins by establishing human inability to save ourselves, creating context for demonstrating God's salvation. Paul follows this pattern in Romans—comprehensive demonstration of universal sin (1:18-3:20) precedes revealing God's righteousness through faith (3:21-26). Daniel's methodology prefigures this—show human bankruptcy, then demonstrate divine sufficiency. This also points to Christ, the only mediator between God and man (1 Timothy 2:5), whose work accomplishes what no human priest, prophet, or king could achieve.