Passage Workspace

Luke 5:21

A focused desk for reading, commentary, cross-references, original language notes, and your own observations.

Chapter Interlinear Verse Page

Luke 5:21

21 And the scribes and the Pharisees began to reason, saying, Who is this which speaketh blasphemies? Who can forgive sins, but God alone?

Chapter Context

Luke 5 is a historical gospel chapter in the New Testament that explores themes of faith, salvation, judgment. Written during the late first century CE (c. 80-85 CE), this chapter should be understood within its historical context: Written when Christians needed to understand their place in the Roman world.

The chapter can be divided into several sections:

  1. Verses 1-5: Introduction and setting the context
  2. Verses 6-12: Development of key themes
  3. Verses 13-20: Central message and teachings
  4. Verses 21-39: Conclusion and application

This chapter is significant because it offers practical wisdom for godly living in a fallen world. When studying this passage, it's important to consider both its immediate context within Luke and its broader place in the scriptural canon.

Verse Study

Luke 5:21

21 And the scribes and the Pharisees began to reason, saying, Who is this which speaketh blasphemies? Who can forgive sins, but God alone?

Analysis

Scribes and Pharisees began to reason saying Who is this that speaks blasphemies Who can forgive sins but God alone. Scribes grammateis Torah experts. Pharisees Pharisaioi religious separatists. Began ērxanto initiated. Reason dialogizesthai think through deliberate. Saying legontes articulating. Who tis interrogative. This houtos derogatory this fellow. Speaks lalōn continuous present. Blasphemies blasphēmias insults to God. Who tis. Can forgive dynatai has power ability. Sins hamartias moral failures. But ei mē except. God alone monos ho theos exclusively. Religious leaders correctly understood implication. Forgiveness divine prerogative. Jesus claiming deity. Either He is God or commits blasphemy. No middle ground. Trilemma liar lunatic Lord. Cannot be merely good teacher. Claims require verdict. Reformed theology affirms Jesus full deity. He has authority to forgive because He is God incarnate. His sacrificial death satisfies justice. Forgiveness not cheap grace but costly purchased by blood.

Historical Context

Forgiveness central to Jewish theology. Day of Atonement sacrifices. God alone forgives based on sacrificial system. Priest mediated did not forgive. Jesus pronouncing forgiveness claimed divine authority. Religious leaders saw clearly implications. Their conclusion logical if Jesus is not God then He blasphemes. Problem was they rejected His deity despite evidence. Miracles fulfilled prophecy authoritative teaching all pointed to deity. Hardness of heart blinded them. Early church proclaimed Jesus divine authority to forgive. Peter Pentecost Paul everywhere preached forgiveness through Christ name alone. This offended Jews polytheists monotheists. Exclusive claim. Offense continues today. Pluralism rejects exclusive claims. But biblical Christianity maintains Christ alone forgives. No other name given among men whereby we must be saved.

Reflection

  • Why is Jesus authority to forgive sins central test of His identity either God or blasphemer?
  • How does religious leaders correct theology (only God forgives) combined with rejection of Jesus deity demonstrate that right doctrine without right response condemns?

Word Studies

  • God: Θεός (Theos) G2316 - God

Cross-References

Original Language

καὶ G2532 ἤρξαντο G756 διαλογίζεσθαι G1260 οἱ G3588 γραμματεῖς G1122 καὶ G2532 οἱ G3588 Φαρισαῖοι G5330 λέγοντες G3004 τίς G5101 ἐστιν G2076 οὗτος G3778 +12