Luke 7:33
For John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine; and ye say, He hath a devil.
Original Language Analysis
Cross References
Historical Context
Table fellowship in ancient Mediterranean culture signified intimate association and acceptance. Pharisees avoided eating with sinners to maintain ritual purity. Jesus's regular dining with tax collectors and notorious sinners scandalized religious leaders. His presence at feasts demonstrated kingdom inclusion of unlikely candidates. The accusation of gluttony and drunkenness was slander—Jesus lived righteously while engaging culture. Early Christians faced similar tensions—separating from pagan immorality while remaining accessible for witness.
Questions for Reflection
- How can Christians engage culture and befriend sinners without compromising holiness?
- What does Jesus's example teach about balancing separation from sin with accessibility to sinners?
- How do we discern when criticism of our ministry reflects biblical faithfulness versus actual failure?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
The contrast: 'The Son of man is come eating and drinking; and ye say, Behold a gluttonous man, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners!' Jesus's sociability—attending dinners, relating to outcasts—drew opposite criticism. Where John was too severe, Jesus was too lenient. The Greek 'phagos kai oinopotēs' (glutton and drunkard) echoes Deuteronomy 21:20's description of rebellious son deserving death. The accusation was serious, not merely social disapproval. Jesus's association with 'publicans and sinners' violated Pharisaic separation standards. Reformed theology observes that Jesus's incarnational ministry required entering sinners' world without adopting their sin. He was 'holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners' (Hebrews 7:26) yet accessible to them.