And as soon as it was day, the elders of the people and the chief priests and the scribes came together, and led him into their council, saying, Dawn brings the formal Sanhedrin trial. The phrase kai hōs egeneto hēmera (καὶ ὡς ἐγένετο ἡμέρα, 'and as it became day') marks legal proceedings—Jewish law required daylight trials. The assembly to presbyterion tou laou archiereis te kai grammateis (τὸ πρεσβυτέριον τοῦ λαοῦ ἀρχιερεῖς τε καὶ γραμματεῖς, 'the council of elders, both chief priests and scribes') represents the Sanhedrin's three groups: elders (tribal leaders), chief priests (Sadducees), and scribes (Pharisees). They synēchthēsan (συνήχθησαν, 'gathered together')—formal convening.
The phrase anēgagon auton eis to synedrion autōn (ἀνήγαγον αὐτὸν εἰς τὸ συνέδριον αὐτῶν, 'they led him into their council') shows Jesus brought before Israel's highest court. The synedrion (συνέδριον, Sanhedrin) had 71 members and authority over religious matters. This 'trial' was predetermined—they already decided to kill Jesus (v. 2), now seeking legal justification. The predawn proceedings with Annas and Caiaphas (John 18:13-24) were illegal reconnaissance; this dawn gathering provides legal veneer for a lynching.
Historical Context
The Sanhedrin met in the Hall of Hewn Stone in the Temple complex. Jewish law (Mishnah tractate Sanhedrin) prohibited capital trials at night, on feast days, or with predetermined verdict. They violated all three. The trial began at dawn (probably 6-7 AM) to finish before Passover lamb sacrifice (afternoon). The chief priests were Sadducees who controlled Temple; scribes were mainly Pharisees who interpreted law. Their cooperation against Jesus shows how seriously they took His threat to their power structures. Though enemies, Pharisees and Sadducees united against Christ.
Questions for Reflection
Why did religious leaders who claimed devotion to law violate it to condemn Jesus?
What does the cooperation between typically antagonistic groups (Pharisees, Sadducees) reveal about opposition to Christ?
How does the legal veneer over predetermined verdict demonstrate religious hypocrisy?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
And as soon as it was day, the elders of the people and the chief priests and the scribes came together, and led him into their council, saying, Dawn brings the formal Sanhedrin trial. The phrase kai hōs egeneto hēmera (καὶ ὡς ἐγένετο ἡμέρα, 'and as it became day') marks legal proceedings—Jewish law required daylight trials. The assembly to presbyterion tou laou archiereis te kai grammateis (τὸ πρεσβυτέριον τοῦ λαοῦ ἀρχιερεῖς τε καὶ γραμματεῖς, 'the council of elders, both chief priests and scribes') represents the Sanhedrin's three groups: elders (tribal leaders), chief priests (Sadducees), and scribes (Pharisees). They synēchthēsan (συνήχθησαν, 'gathered together')—formal convening.
The phrase anēgagon auton eis to synedrion autōn (ἀνήγαγον αὐτὸν εἰς τὸ συνέδριον αὐτῶν, 'they led him into their council') shows Jesus brought before Israel's highest court. The synedrion (συνέδριον, Sanhedrin) had 71 members and authority over religious matters. This 'trial' was predetermined—they already decided to kill Jesus (v. 2), now seeking legal justification. The predawn proceedings with Annas and Caiaphas (John 18:13-24) were illegal reconnaissance; this dawn gathering provides legal veneer for a lynching.