Lamentations 3:39
Wherefore doth a living man complain, a man for the punishment of his sins?
Original Language Analysis
Cross References
Historical Context
Complaining marked Israel's wilderness generation. Despite miraculous deliverance from Egypt, provision of manna, water from rocks, and God's presence in the pillar of cloud and fire, they repeatedly murmured against God and Moses (Exodus 15:24, 16:2-3, 17:3, Numbers 14:2, 16:41). This complaining spirit revealed unbelief and ingratitude.
The exile generation risked similar attitudes. Having experienced prophesied judgment for covenant breaking, they might blame God for severity or unfairness. The proverb quoted in Ezekiel 18:2—"The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge"—reflects this complaint. People blamed previous generations while minimizing their own guilt.
But Ezekiel 18 refutes this, emphasizing individual responsibility. Lamentations 3:39 makes similar point: living people experiencing judgment's consequences have no grounds for complaint because sin deserves death. That anyone survives demonstrates mercy. Archaeological evidence shows that while Jerusalem was destroyed and many died, a remnant survived—both those exiled to Babylon and those left in the land under Gedaliah's governorship.
The attitude contrasts sharply with genuine lament. David's psalms often cry out in anguish (Psalm 13, 22, 42-43, 77), yet always return to trust in God's character. Job maintained his integrity through horrific loss. The difference lies in whether one accuses God of injustice versus honestly bringing pain to Him while ultimately submitting to His wisdom and sovereignty.
Questions for Reflection
- How does recognizing that 'living' itself is evidence of God's mercy transform our perspective on hardship and consequences of sin?
- What's the difference between biblical lament (crying out to God) and sinful complaining (grumbling against God), and how can we discern which we're doing?
- When is suffering 'for the punishment of sins' versus innocent suffering, and how should our response differ between these situations?
- In what areas might you be complaining against God for consequences that actually result from your own choices, and what would confession look like?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
A rhetorical question challenges self-pity: "Wherefore doth a living man complain, a man for the punishment of his sins?" (mah yitonen adam chai gever al-cheta'av, מַה־יִּתְאוֹנֵן אָדָם חַי גֶּבֶר עַל־חֲטָאָיו). The term chai (חַי, "living") is significant—the very fact of continued existence demonstrates mercy. Under strict justice, sinners deserve death (Romans 6:23); life itself is grace.
The word yitonen (יִּתְאוֹנֵן, "complain") carries negative connotation—not legitimate lament (which Lamentations models) but grumbling, murmuring against God. Numbers 11:1 and 14:27-29 show God's severe response to Israel's complaining in the wilderness. The distinction is crucial: honest expression of pain to God is biblical; complaining against God's justice is sin.
The phrase "for the punishment of his sins" (al-cheta'av, עַל־חֲטָאָיו) provides the answer to the rhetorical question. When suffering results from our own sin, complaint is inappropriate. Proverbs 19:3 observes: "The foolishness of man perverteth his way: and his heart fretteth against the LORD." We bring consequences on ourselves, then blame God. The proper response is confession (verse 40-42), not complaint. This verse doesn't address innocent suffering (Job, Psalms 73) but deserved judgment—a critical distinction.