And the children of Dan sent of their family five men from their coasts, men of valour, from Zorah, and from Eshtaol, to spy out the land, and to search it; and they said unto them, Go, search the land: who when they came to mount Ephraim, to the house of Micah, they lodged there.
And the children of Dan sent of their family five men from their coasts, men of valour, from Zorah, and from Eshtaol, to spy out the land, and to search it. The tribe of Dan faced a crisis: Amorite pressure prevented them from possessing their allotted territory (Judges 1:34-35). Rather than seeking God's help to defeat their enemies, they sent spies to find easier conquest elsewhere. The phrase "men of valour" (anashim benei chayil, אֲנָשִׁים בְּנֵי־חַיִל) typically commends military prowess, yet their mission reveals faithlessness—courage misdirected toward abandoning God's assignment.
The Hebrew verbs "spy out" (leragel, לְרַגֵּל) and "search" (lachkor, לַחְקֹר) echo the reconnaissance mission in Numbers 13-14 that ended in unbelief and judgment. Like their ancestors at Kadesh-barnea, Dan looked at circumstances rather than God's promises. The parallelism is deliberate: both involved sending spies, both faced strong enemies, both chose unbelief over faith. God had given Dan their inheritance; their responsibility was to trust Him for victory, not seek alternatives. From a Reformed perspective, this illustrates the danger of pragmatism over obedience—choosing what seems achievable by human strength rather than what God has commanded.
Historical Context
Zorah and Eshtaol were Danite towns in the Shephelah (lowlands) bordering Philistine territory (Joshua 19:41). This was prime agricultural land, but Philistine military superiority (iron weapons, chariots) and Amorite resistance made conquest difficult. Rather than persevere, Dan sought conquest elsewhere. The five-man reconnaissance mission mirrors the twelve spies Moses sent (Numbers 13:3-16), though with only five representing Dan's diminished faith. Archaeological evidence confirms Philistine expansion into the coastal plain during this period (c. 1200-1100 BC), creating pressure on Israelite settlement.
Questions for Reflection
How do we sometimes abandon God's clear assignments when they become difficult, seeking easier alternatives?
What does Dan's response to opposition teach about the difference between faith-filled perseverance and pragmatic compromise?
How can we discern whether obstacles indicate we should change course or persevere in faith?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
And the children of Dan sent of their family five men from their coasts, men of valour, from Zorah, and from Eshtaol, to spy out the land, and to search it. The tribe of Dan faced a crisis: Amorite pressure prevented them from possessing their allotted territory (Judges 1:34-35). Rather than seeking God's help to defeat their enemies, they sent spies to find easier conquest elsewhere. The phrase "men of valour" (anashim benei chayil, אֲנָשִׁים בְּנֵי־חַיִל) typically commends military prowess, yet their mission reveals faithlessness—courage misdirected toward abandoning God's assignment.
The Hebrew verbs "spy out" (leragel, לְרַגֵּל) and "search" (lachkor, לַחְקֹר) echo the reconnaissance mission in Numbers 13-14 that ended in unbelief and judgment. Like their ancestors at Kadesh-barnea, Dan looked at circumstances rather than God's promises. The parallelism is deliberate: both involved sending spies, both faced strong enemies, both chose unbelief over faith. God had given Dan their inheritance; their responsibility was to trust Him for victory, not seek alternatives. From a Reformed perspective, this illustrates the danger of pragmatism over obedience—choosing what seems achievable by human strength rather than what God has commanded.