In those days there was no king in Israel: and in those days the tribe of the Danites sought them an inheritance to dwell in; for unto that day all their inheritance had not fallen unto them among the tribes of Israel.
In those days there was no king in Israel: and in those days the tribe of the Danites sought them an inheritance to dwell in. Dan had been allotted fertile western territory (Joshua 19:40-48), but Amorites "forced the children of Dan into the mountain" (Judges 1:34). Rather than trusting God for victory, Dan sought easier conquest elsewhere. The phrase "sought them an inheritance" reveals unbelief—God had already given them an inheritance; their responsibility was to possess it through faith. Their refusal mirrors Israel's unbelief at Kadesh-barnea (Numbers 13-14). From a Reformed perspective, God's promises require faith-filled obedience to realize. We cannot abandon God's assignments because they're difficult and expect blessing in self-chosen paths. Dan's choice had lasting consequences: geographic isolation, vulnerability to attacks, and becoming synonymous with idolatry when Jeroboam placed a golden calf there (1 Kings 12:28-30).
Historical Context
Dan's original allotment was prime agricultural land in the Shephelah bordering Philistine territory. Philistine military superiority (iron weapons and chariots) and Amorite resistance made conquest difficult. Rather than persevere in faith, Dan sought easier territory in the far north. Archaeological excavations at Tel Dan confirm the city's Canaanite destruction and Israelite rebuilding during the Judges period. This relocation isolated Dan geographically and spiritually, contributing to their later apostasy. The city of Dan eventually became Israel's northernmost point, referenced in the phrase "from Dan to Beer-sheba," but also became a center of idolatrous worship that persisted for centuries.
Questions for Reflection
How do we abandon God's clear assignments because they're difficult, seeking easier alternatives?
What does Dan's choice teach about the long-term consequences of faithlessness?
How does Dan's failure illustrate the necessity of faith-filled perseverance in claiming God's promises?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
In those days there was no king in Israel: and in those days the tribe of the Danites sought them an inheritance to dwell in. Dan had been allotted fertile western territory (Joshua 19:40-48), but Amorites "forced the children of Dan into the mountain" (Judges 1:34). Rather than trusting God for victory, Dan sought easier conquest elsewhere. The phrase "sought them an inheritance" reveals unbelief—God had already given them an inheritance; their responsibility was to possess it through faith. Their refusal mirrors Israel's unbelief at Kadesh-barnea (Numbers 13-14). From a Reformed perspective, God's promises require faith-filled obedience to realize. We cannot abandon God's assignments because they're difficult and expect blessing in self-chosen paths. Dan's choice had lasting consequences: geographic isolation, vulnerability to attacks, and becoming synonymous with idolatry when Jeroboam placed a golden calf there (1 Kings 12:28-30).