When ye go, ye shall come unto a people secure, and to a large land: for God hath given it into your hands; a place where there is no want of any thing that is in the earth.
When ye go, ye shall come unto a people secure, and to a large land: for God hath given it into your hands; a place where there is no want of any thing that is in the earth. The spies' assurance "God hath given it into your hands" (Elohim netanah beyedkhem, אֱלֹהִים נְתָנָהּ בְיֶדְכֶם) appropriates divine-promise language without actual divine authorization. They use Elohim (אֱלֹהִים, generic "God") rather than Yahweh (יְהוָה, covenant name), and the perfect tense "hath given" (natan, נָתַן) mimics how God spoke about the promised land. Yet God had already given Dan specific territory (Joshua 19:40-48); this unauthorized conquest contradicted His revealed will.
The description—"a people secure" (am botei'ach, עַם בֹּטֵחַ), "a large land" (eretz rachabat yadayim, אֶרֶץ רַחֲבַת יָדַיִם, literally "broad of hands"), "no want of any thing" (ein sham machsor kol-davar, אֵין־שָׁם מַחְסוֹר כָּל־דָּבָר)—emphasizes material abundance, not covenant faithfulness. This pragmatic focus reveals their values: they sought prosperity and ease, not God's glory or obedient possession of His promises. From a Reformed perspective, claiming God's blessing on self-chosen paths while ignoring His revealed will is presumption, not faith. True faith submits to God's Word even when it seems difficult, trusting His wisdom over human assessment of circumstances (Proverbs 3:5-6, Isaiah 55:8-9).
Historical Context
The spies' assurance proved technically accurate—Dan did conquer Laish successfully. But worldly success doesn't validate disobedience. The conquest established Dan's northern settlement, which became synonymous with idolatry (1 Kings 12:28-30) and eventually suffered judgment. God sometimes permits disobedient paths to 'succeed' in temporal terms while bringing spiritual disaster. The spies' promise of material abundance was fulfilled, but at the cost of spiritual health and eventual exile.
Questions for Reflection
How do we sometimes claim God's blessing on plans He never authorized, using spiritual language to justify self-will?
What's the difference between circumstances confirming God's will and circumstances merely presenting opportunities for disobedience?
In what ways might material success or apparent ease actually indicate you're outside God's best purposes for your life?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
When ye go, ye shall come unto a people secure, and to a large land: for God hath given it into your hands; a place where there is no want of any thing that is in the earth. The spies' assurance "God hath given it into your hands" (Elohim netanah beyedkhem, אֱלֹהִים נְתָנָהּ בְיֶדְכֶם) appropriates divine-promise language without actual divine authorization. They use Elohim (אֱלֹהִים, generic "God") rather than Yahweh (יְהוָה, covenant name), and the perfect tense "hath given" (natan, נָתַן) mimics how God spoke about the promised land. Yet God had already given Dan specific territory (Joshua 19:40-48); this unauthorized conquest contradicted His revealed will.
The description—"a people secure" (am botei'ach, עַם בֹּטֵחַ), "a large land" (eretz rachabat yadayim, אֶרֶץ רַחֲבַת יָדַיִם, literally "broad of hands"), "no want of any thing" (ein sham machsor kol-davar, אֵין־שָׁם מַחְסוֹר כָּל־דָּבָר)—emphasizes material abundance, not covenant faithfulness. This pragmatic focus reveals their values: they sought prosperity and ease, not God's glory or obedient possession of His promises. From a Reformed perspective, claiming God's blessing on self-chosen paths while ignoring His revealed will is presumption, not faith. True faith submits to God's Word even when it seems difficult, trusting His wisdom over human assessment of circumstances (Proverbs 3:5-6, Isaiah 55:8-9).