In the morning therefore ye shall be brought according to your tribes: and it shall be, that the tribe which the LORD taketh shall come according to the families thereof; and the family which the LORD shall take shall come by households; and the household which the LORD shall take shall come man by man.
God prescribes the process for identifying the guilty party: 'ye shall be brought according to your tribes...families...households...man by man.' This methodical narrowing from tribe to individual demonstrates God's precision—nothing is hidden from Him (Hebrews 4:13). The phrase 'he that is taken with the accursed thing shall be burnt with fire' specifies the penalty—capital punishment by fire, the most severe form reflecting the gravity of the offense. Fire symbolizes God's holiness consuming sin utterly. The expanded punishment—'he, and all that he hath'—extends to possessions and possibly family, illustrating sin's ripple effects. The rationale: 'he hath transgressed the covenant of the LORD, and...wrought folly in Israel.' Covenant violation isn't merely breaking rules but betraying relationship with God. 'Folly' (nebalah, נְבָלָה) means senseless wickedness, moral outrage—not simple mistake but deliberate defiance. This process combines divine revelation (God identifies) and human responsibility (Israel executes judgment), modeling how God's people address sin.
Historical Context
The tribal system provided Israel's organizational structure. Moving from tribe to clan to household to individual showed the integration of corporate and individual identity—you were part of concentric circles of relationship and responsibility. The use of lots (implied in 'taken') was standard Israelite practice for discerning God's will (Proverbs 16:33). This wasn't magic but reliance on God's sovereign control over apparently random processes. Archaeological evidence from ancient Israel confirms the household structure—extended families living in compounds. Achan's sin affected his entire household because they either knew and concealed it or benefited from the stolen items. Capital punishment for covenant violation reinforces that covenant relationship with God was Israel's foundational reality—violating it threatened community survival. The specification 'burnt with fire' distinguished this from typical capital punishment (stoning), emphasizing total consumption and purification.
Questions for Reflection
What does the progression from tribe to individual teach about balancing corporate and personal responsibility?
How should churches today identify and address sin while maintaining both grace and accountability?
What makes covenant violation 'folly' rather than mere rule-breaking?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
God prescribes the process for identifying the guilty party: 'ye shall be brought according to your tribes...families...households...man by man.' This methodical narrowing from tribe to individual demonstrates God's precision—nothing is hidden from Him (Hebrews 4:13). The phrase 'he that is taken with the accursed thing shall be burnt with fire' specifies the penalty—capital punishment by fire, the most severe form reflecting the gravity of the offense. Fire symbolizes God's holiness consuming sin utterly. The expanded punishment—'he, and all that he hath'—extends to possessions and possibly family, illustrating sin's ripple effects. The rationale: 'he hath transgressed the covenant of the LORD, and...wrought folly in Israel.' Covenant violation isn't merely breaking rules but betraying relationship with God. 'Folly' (nebalah, נְבָלָה) means senseless wickedness, moral outrage—not simple mistake but deliberate defiance. This process combines divine revelation (God identifies) and human responsibility (Israel executes judgment), modeling how God's people address sin.