Job 21:28
For ye say, Where is the house of the prince? and where are the dwelling places of the wicked?
Original Language Analysis
כִּ֤י
H3588
כִּ֤י
Strong's:
H3588
Word #:
1 of 9
(by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below); often largely modified by other particles annexed
בֵית
Where is the house
H1004
בֵית
Where is the house
Strong's:
H1004
Word #:
4 of 9
a house (in the greatest variation of applications, especially family, etc.)
נָדִ֑יב
of the prince
H5081
נָדִ֑יב
of the prince
Strong's:
H5081
Word #:
5 of 9
properly, voluntary, i.e., generous; hence, magnanimous; as noun, a grandee (sometimes a tyrant)
Historical Context
Ancient Near Eastern wisdom used examples as proof. The friends would point to destroyed houses (including Job's) as evidence that wickedness brings destruction. Job recognizes this move and challenges it by appealing to broader observation.
Questions for Reflection
- How do we avoid using anecdotal evidence to support predetermined theological conclusions?
- What role does broader observation play in testing our theological frameworks?
- How do we remain open to revising theology when reality challenges it?
Analysis & Commentary
Job anticipates their response: 'For ye say, Where is the house of the prince? and where are the dwelling places of the wicked?' Job knows they'll point to his losses as evidence of wickedness. The rhetorical question format shows their confidence—'Where are the wicked? See, destroyed like Job!' Job anticipates their argument to preemptively refute it. His lost house doesn't prove his wickedness.