Job 20:7

Authorized King James Version

PDF

Yet he shall perish for ever like his own dung: they which have seen him shall say, Where is he?

Original Language Analysis

כְּֽ֭גֶלֲלוֹ like his own dung H1561
כְּֽ֭גֶלֲלוֹ like his own dung
Strong's: H1561
Word #: 1 of 6
dung (plural balls of dung)
לָנֶ֣צַח for ever H5331
לָנֶ֣צַח for ever
Strong's: H5331
Word #: 2 of 6
properly, a goal, i.e., the bright object at a distance travelled towards; hence (figuratively), splendor, or (subjectively) truthfulness, or (objecti
יֹאבֵ֑ד Yet he shall perish H6
יֹאבֵ֑ד Yet he shall perish
Strong's: H6
Word #: 3 of 6
properly, to wander away, i.e., lose oneself; by implication to perish (causative, destroy)
רֹ֝אָ֗יו they which have seen H7200
רֹ֝אָ֗יו they which have seen
Strong's: H7200
Word #: 4 of 6
to see, literally or figuratively (in numerous applications, direct and implied, transitive, intransitive and causative)
יֹאמְר֥וּ him shall say H559
יֹאמְר֥וּ him shall say
Strong's: H559
Word #: 5 of 6
to say (used with great latitude)
אַיּֽוֹ׃ Where H335
אַיּֽוֹ׃ Where
Strong's: H335
Word #: 6 of 6
where? hence how?

Analysis & Commentary

Yet he shall perish for ever like his own dung (כְּגֶלְלוֹ לָנֶצַח יֹאבֵד, keglelo lanetsach yoved)—Zophar delivers the book's most visceral, repulsive image: the wicked person perishes כְּגֶלְלוֹ (keglelo, 'like his dung/excrement'). The noun גָּלָל (galal) is animal dung, used for fuel but considered unclean. לָנֶצַח (lanetsach, 'forever, perpetually') intensifies the judgment: permanent rubbish.

They which have seen him shall say, Where is he? (רֹאָיו יֹאמְרוּ אַיּוֹ, ro'av yomru 'ayyo)—The wicked vanish so completely that witnesses ask אַיּוֹ ('ayyo, 'Where?')—an interrogative of absence. Zophar assumes Job's suffering proves him wicked, headed for oblivion. The irony: Job will be vindicated, remembered, and his words canonized, while Zophar's name means 'chirper'—insignificant noise.

Historical Context

The image of dung as worthlessness appears across Scripture. Paul considers his credentials 'dung' (σκύβαλον, skubalon) compared to knowing Christ (Philippians 3:8). Zophar weaponizes this metaphor against Job, but the book's resolution proves Zophar spoke 'dung'—his theology was the refuse, not Job's life.

Questions for Reflection