For, lo, I begin to bring evil on the city which is called by my name, and should ye be utterly unpunished? Ye shall not be unpunished: for I will call for a sword upon all the inhabitants of the earth, saith the LORD of hosts.
For, lo, I begin to bring evil on the city which is called by my name, and should ye be utterly unpunished? Ye shall not be unpunished: for I will call for a sword upon all the inhabitants of the earth, saith the LORD of hosts. The phrase bāʿîr ʾăsher-niqrāʾ šĕmî ʿāleyhā (בָעִיר אֲשֶׁר־נִקְרָא שְׁמִי עָלֶיהָ, the city which is called by my name) refers to Jerusalem, the temple city bearing Yahweh's name. The logic is compelling: if God judges His own covenant city and people, how can pagan nations expect exemption? The rhetorical question wĕʾattem hinnāqēh tinnāqû (וְאַתֶּם הִנָּקֵה תִנָּקוּ, and should you be utterly unpunished?) expects a negative answer.
The emphatic denial lōʾ ṯinnāqû (לֹא תִנָּקוּ, you shall not be unpunished) reinforces certainty. Peter echoes this principle: 'judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?' (1 Peter 4:17). Greater privilege brings greater accountability. If covenant people face judgment for unfaithfulness, how much more those who never acknowledged the true God? Yet the reverse is also true—if God judges His own people to purify and restore them, there is hope for gentiles who repent (Romans 11:11-32).
Historical Context
This argument would resonate powerfully with ancient Near Eastern peoples. Jerusalem was famous as the city of the great God Yahweh, housing the magnificent temple. If even this privileged city faced destruction, no city was safe. The logic was inescapable. When Jerusalem fell (586 BC), surrounding nations recognized this as divine judgment, not merely military defeat (Lamentations 2:15-16). The theological implications were clear: if Yahweh judged His own people, all nations stood accountable before Him.
Questions for Reflection
How does the principle 'judgment begins with God's people' challenge the assumption that church membership or religious heritage guarantees security?
What does God's judgment of Jerusalem teach about the relationship between privilege and accountability?
If God judges those who know Him for unfaithfulness, what does this imply about the certainty of judgment for those who have never acknowledged Him?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
For, lo, I begin to bring evil on the city which is called by my name, and should ye be utterly unpunished? Ye shall not be unpunished: for I will call for a sword upon all the inhabitants of the earth, saith the LORD of hosts. The phrase bāʿîr ʾăsher-niqrāʾ šĕmî ʿāleyhā (בָעִיר אֲשֶׁר־נִקְרָא שְׁמִי עָלֶיהָ, the city which is called by my name) refers to Jerusalem, the temple city bearing Yahweh's name. The logic is compelling: if God judges His own covenant city and people, how can pagan nations expect exemption? The rhetorical question wĕʾattem hinnāqēh tinnāqû (וְאַתֶּם הִנָּקֵה תִנָּקוּ, and should you be utterly unpunished?) expects a negative answer.
The emphatic denial lōʾ ṯinnāqû (לֹא תִנָּקוּ, you shall not be unpunished) reinforces certainty. Peter echoes this principle: 'judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?' (1 Peter 4:17). Greater privilege brings greater accountability. If covenant people face judgment for unfaithfulness, how much more those who never acknowledged the true God? Yet the reverse is also true—if God judges His own people to purify and restore them, there is hope for gentiles who repent (Romans 11:11-32).