Jeremiah 2:1

Authorized King James Version

PDF

Moreover the word of the LORD came to me, saying,

Original Language Analysis

וַיְהִ֥י H1961
וַיְהִ֥י
Strong's: H1961
Word #: 1 of 5
to exist, i.e., be or become, come to pass (always emphatic, and not a mere copula or auxiliary)
דְבַר Moreover the word H1697
דְבַר Moreover the word
Strong's: H1697
Word #: 2 of 5
a word; by implication, a matter (as spoken of) or thing; adverbially, a cause
יְהוָ֖ה of the LORD H3068
יְהוָ֖ה of the LORD
Strong's: H3068
Word #: 3 of 5
(the) self-existent or eternal; jeho-vah, jewish national name of god
אֵלַ֥י H413
אֵלַ֥י
Strong's: H413
Word #: 4 of 5
near, with or among; often in general, to
לֵאמֹֽר׃ came to me saying H559
לֵאמֹֽר׃ came to me saying
Strong's: H559
Word #: 5 of 5
to say (used with great latitude)

Analysis & Commentary

This verse introduces a new prophetic oracle: 'Moreover the word of the LORD came to me, saying.' The familiar formula signals fresh divine revelation distinct from chapter 1's call narrative. This transitional phrase appears throughout Jeremiah, marking new prophetic messages. Chapter 2 begins God's indictment of Israel's covenant unfaithfulness through vivid imagery and direct accusation. The structure reflects ancient Near Eastern covenant lawsuit (rib, רִיב) pattern where the suzerain (God) brings charges against the vassal (Israel) for treaty violations. This legal framework appears frequently in prophetic literature (Hosea 4:1, Micah 6:1-2, Isaiah 1:2-3) and establishes that God's judgment isn't arbitrary but based on specific covenant violations with clear evidence. The phrase 'came to me' emphasizes prophetic mediation—God's word comes to the prophet who then communicates it to the people. This establishes Scripture's revelatory nature: prophets received messages they did not originate.

Historical Context

Jeremiah 2-6 likely dates to early in his ministry (late Josiah or early Jehoiakim reign, 620s-600s BC), before Babylonian invasions but while Josiah's reforms were proving superficial. The covenant lawsuit form reflects ancient treaty structures discovered in Hittite texts and Assyrian vassal treaties. These treaties specified blessings for obedience and curses for violation, with formal legal procedures for addressing breaches. Israel's covenant with Yahweh (Exodus 19-24, Deuteronomy) followed similar patterns—God as suzerain, Israel as vassal, with stipulated obligations and consequences. When Israel broke covenant, prophets delivered divine lawsuits detailing charges, evidence, and verdict. Understanding this legal framework clarifies why prophets spend extensive text reviewing Israel's history and God's faithfulness—they're presenting evidence in a covenant court case. The guilty verdict leads to covenant curses (Deuteronomy 28) including exile.

Questions for Reflection

Related Resources

Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.

People