Isaiah 49:14

Authorized King James Version

PDF

But Zion said, The LORD hath forsaken me, and my Lord hath forgotten me.

Original Language Analysis

וַתֹּ֥אמֶר said H559
וַתֹּ֥אמֶר said
Strong's: H559
Word #: 1 of 6
to say (used with great latitude)
צִיּ֖וֹן But Zion H6726
צִיּ֖וֹן But Zion
Strong's: H6726
Word #: 2 of 6
tsijon (as a permanent capital), a mountain of jerusalem
עֲזָבַ֣נִי hath forsaken H5800
עֲזָבַ֣נִי hath forsaken
Strong's: H5800
Word #: 3 of 6
to loosen, i.e., relinquish, permit, etc
יְהוָ֑ה The LORD H3068
יְהוָ֑ה The LORD
Strong's: H3068
Word #: 4 of 6
(the) self-existent or eternal; jeho-vah, jewish national name of god
וַאדֹנָ֖י me and my Lord H136
וַאדֹנָ֖י me and my Lord
Strong's: H136
Word #: 5 of 6
the lord (used as a proper name of god only)
שְׁכֵחָֽנִי׃ hath forgotten H7911
שְׁכֵחָֽנִי׃ hath forgotten
Strong's: H7911
Word #: 6 of 6
to mislay, i.e., to be oblivious of, from want of memory or attention

Analysis & Commentary

But Zion said, The LORD hath forsaken me, and my Lord hath forgotten me. This verse voices the deep despair of God's people in exile, providing a stark counterpoint to the cosmic praise of verse 13. "Zion" personifies Jerusalem and by extension the covenant community. The dual complaint—forsaken ('azab, עָזַב) and forgotten (shakach, שָׁכַח)—intensifies the sense of divine abandonment. The repetition of divine titles ("LORD" = YHWH; "Lord" = Adonai) underscores the theological crisis: has the covenant God truly abandoned His promises?

This honest expression of doubt reflects a recurring biblical pattern where faith wrestles with apparent divine absence (Psalms 13, 22, 77). From a Reformed perspective, God allows His people to voice their struggles without condemnation—the lament psalms demonstrate that honest questioning before God is legitimate worship. Yet this perceived abandonment contradicts divine reality; God's subsequent response (verses 15-16) emphatically denies the charge.

Theologically, this verse addresses the problem of evil and suffering for God's people. The exile seemed to contradict God's covenant promises, yet Isaiah teaches that divine purposes transcend immediate circumstances. Christ Himself experienced the ultimate forsakenness on the cross ("My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" Matthew 27:46), bearing the judgment that allows God never truly to forsake His elect (Romans 8:38-39).

Historical Context

This complaint reflects Israel's experience during the Babylonian exile (586-538 BCE). The destruction of Jerusalem and the temple—God's dwelling place—created a profound theological crisis. If the temple was destroyed and the people exiled, had God abandoned His covenant? The prophets Jeremiah and Ezekiel addressed similar concerns during this period.

Ancient Near Eastern theology typically viewed military defeat as evidence that a nation's god was weaker than the conqueror's deity. Israel faced this challenge: did Babylon's victory mean Marduk was stronger than Yahweh? Isaiah's response affirms that exile resulted from divine judgment for covenant violation, not divine weakness. More importantly, God had not forgotten His people; their restoration was assured by His unchanging character and covenant faithfulness.

Questions for Reflection

Related Resources

Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.

People