Habakkuk 1:15
They take up all of them with the angle, they catch them in their net, and gather them in their drag: therefore they rejoice and are glad.
Original Language Analysis
Cross References
Historical Context
Babylonian inscriptions confirm their pride in conquest. Kings boasted of territories conquered, peoples subjugated, and wealth acquired. They viewed military success as evidence of divine favor and personal greatness. This arrogant joy in destruction is precisely what Habakkuk describes and what would later bring judgment on Babylon itself (Isaiah 47, Jeremiah 50-51). God used Babylon's pride and cruelty to judge Judah, but then judged Babylon for that very pride and cruelty. This demonstrates God's complex sovereignty: using evil to punish evil, then punishing the instrument of punishment. It shows that God maintains moral governance even when using immoral agents.
Questions for Reflection
- How does God's later judgment of Babylon demonstrate that He holds nations accountable for methods used even when accomplishing His purposes?
- What does this passage teach about the difference between divine permission and divine approval?
- How should believers think about God's relationship to human evil—His use of it versus His judgment of it?
Analysis & Commentary
The fishing metaphor continues: 'They take up all of them with the angle, they catch them in their net, and gather them in their drag: therefore they rejoice and are glad' (kullo bechakkah he'elah yasgharehu bechermo ve'easphehu bemikhmarto al-ken yismach veyagil). Babylon uses various fishing methods—angle (chakkah), net (cherem), dragnet (mikhmar)—depicting systematic, comprehensive conquest. Nothing escapes. Worse: 'therefore they rejoice and are glad' (al-ken yismach veyagil)—they celebrate their cruelty. This isn't reluctant judgment but gleeful destruction. Babylon doesn't merely execute divine judgment; they delight in violence and domination. This creates moral tension: how can God use those who enjoy evil to accomplish righteous purposes? The question addresses the mystery of divine providence—God working through sinful human agency without being tainted by that sin or approving it.