And I, brethren, if I yet preach circumcision, why do I yet suffer persecution? then is the offence of the cross ceased. Paul addresses false claim. "And I, brethren" (egō de, adelphoi, ἐγὼ δέ, ἀδελφοί)—as for me, brothers. "If I yet preach circumcision" (ei peritomēn eti kēryssō)—if I still proclaim circumcision as necessary. Apparently the Judaizers claimed Paul taught circumcision when among Jews, only omitting it with Gentiles—convenient inconsistency. Paul denies this: if I preached circumcision for righteousness, persecution would cease!
"Why do I yet suffer persecution?" (ti eti diōkomai, τί ἔτι διώκομαι)—why am I still being persecuted? Present tense: ongoing persecution. His suffering proved he didn't preach circumcision. "Then is the offence of the cross ceased" (ara katērgētai to skandalon tou staurou, ἄρα κατήργηται τὸ σκάνδαλον τοῦ σταυροῦ)—then the stumbling block of the cross is removed. Skandalon (σκάνδαλον) is offense, stumbling block. The cross offends because it declares human righteousness worthless—salvation is entirely God's work. Adding circumcision removes this offense, making salvation partly human achievement. Paul won't compromise to avoid persecution.
Historical Context
Paul faced constant persecution from Jews offended by his gospel of grace apart from law (Acts 13:45, 14:19, 17:5, 2 Corinthians 11:24-26). If he'd compromised by requiring circumcision, Jewish opposition would have ceased—they'd see him as bringing Gentiles into proper Torah observance. His persecution proved gospel integrity. The cross remains offensive: it humbles human pride, declares works useless, credits all to God. Any gospel that doesn't offend human pride probably isn't the biblical gospel. Comfortable, popular Christianity usually involves compromise.
Questions for Reflection
Does your presentation of the gospel retain the 'offense of the cross'—that human righteousness is worthless and salvation is entirely God's work?
How do you recognize when you've compromised the gospel to make it more palatable or avoid opposition?
What persecution or opposition do you face for holding to the biblical gospel without compromise?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
And I, brethren, if I yet preach circumcision, why do I yet suffer persecution? then is the offence of the cross ceased. Paul addresses false claim. "And I, brethren" (egō de, adelphoi, ἐγὼ δέ, ἀδελφοί)—as for me, brothers. "If I yet preach circumcision" (ei peritomēn eti kēryssō)—if I still proclaim circumcision as necessary. Apparently the Judaizers claimed Paul taught circumcision when among Jews, only omitting it with Gentiles—convenient inconsistency. Paul denies this: if I preached circumcision for righteousness, persecution would cease!
"Why do I yet suffer persecution?" (ti eti diōkomai, τί ἔτι διώκομαι)—why am I still being persecuted? Present tense: ongoing persecution. His suffering proved he didn't preach circumcision. "Then is the offence of the cross ceased" (ara katērgētai to skandalon tou staurou, ἄρα κατήργηται τὸ σκάνδαλον τοῦ σταυροῦ)—then the stumbling block of the cross is removed. Skandalon (σκάνδαλον) is offense, stumbling block. The cross offends because it declares human righteousness worthless—salvation is entirely God's work. Adding circumcision removes this offense, making salvation partly human achievement. Paul won't compromise to avoid persecution.