For we are sold, I and my people, to be destroyed, to be slain, and to perish. But if we had been sold for bondmen and bondwomen, I had held my tongue, although the enemy could not countervail the king's damage.
For we are sold, I and my people, to be destroyed, to be slain, and to perish. But if we had been sold for bondmen and bondwomen, I had held my tongue, although the enemy could not countervail the king's damage. Esther reveals the decree's content: "we are sold...to be destroyed, to be slain, and to perish." The threefold description echoes Haman's decree language (3:13), emphasizing totality. The phrase "sold" references Haman's financial offer (3:9), suggesting Ahasuerus accepted payment for genocide. Esther's statement "if we had been sold for bondmen and bondwomen, I had held my tongue" shows she wouldn't trouble the king for mere slavery—only total annihilation justifies her risky intercession. The phrase "the enemy could not countervail the king's damage" suggests Jewish extermination would harm the kingdom economically or strategically—Jews contributed to Persian prosperity. This appeal combines emotional ("I and my people"), legal (unjust decree), and practical (royal interest) arguments.
Historical Context
Ancient Near Eastern rulers sometimes authorized enslavement or relocation of conquered or troublesome peoples, but total extermination was rare. Esther's argument that Jews weren't merely being enslaved but annihilated emphasized the decree's extreme nature. Her suggestion that eliminating Jews would damage royal interests had basis—Jews were productive subjects who contributed economically and administratively (Mordecai being one example). The phrase "the enemy could not countervail" might mean the bribe offered for eliminating Jews couldn't compensate for losing their contributions. This argument appealed to royal self-interest, a practical consideration that might move the king when abstract justice wouldn't.
Questions for Reflection
How does Esther's combination of emotional appeal, justice argument, and practical considerations model effective advocacy for the oppressed?
What does her strategic rhetoric teach about adapting appeals to the audience's values and motivations?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
For we are sold, I and my people, to be destroyed, to be slain, and to perish. But if we had been sold for bondmen and bondwomen, I had held my tongue, although the enemy could not countervail the king's damage. Esther reveals the decree's content: "we are sold...to be destroyed, to be slain, and to perish." The threefold description echoes Haman's decree language (3:13), emphasizing totality. The phrase "sold" references Haman's financial offer (3:9), suggesting Ahasuerus accepted payment for genocide. Esther's statement "if we had been sold for bondmen and bondwomen, I had held my tongue" shows she wouldn't trouble the king for mere slavery—only total annihilation justifies her risky intercession. The phrase "the enemy could not countervail the king's damage" suggests Jewish extermination would harm the kingdom economically or strategically—Jews contributed to Persian prosperity. This appeal combines emotional ("I and my people"), legal (unjust decree), and practical (royal interest) arguments.