And whatsoever mine eyes desired I kept not from them, I withheld not my heart from any joy; for my heart rejoiced in all my labour: and this was my portion of all my labour.
And whatsoever mine eyes desired I kept not from them—the Hebrew 'sha'al' (שָׁאַל, desired/asked) suggests eyes making requests that Solomon granted unconditionally. He denied himself nothing visually appealing or aesthetically pleasing. I withheld not my heart from any joy—complete indulgence in every form of pleasure. The phrase 'simchah' (שִׂמְחָה, joy) encompasses happiness, celebration, and delight. Solomon's experiment was comprehensive and unrestrained.
Yet despite unlimited indulgence, he concludes: for my heart rejoiced in all my labour: and this was my portion of all my labour. The Hebrew 'cheleq' (חֵלֶק, portion) refers to one's allotted share or inheritance. After exhausting every pleasure, Solomon's only lasting 'portion' was the temporary enjoyment derived from the work itself—not from accumulated possessions or achievements, but from the process of labor. This prepares for verse 11's devastating conclusion: even this temporary enjoyment proves 'vanity and vexation of spirit.' The verse anticipates Jesus's warning: 'What shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?' (Mark 8:36).
Historical Context
Solomon's resources enabled unprecedented experimentation. Unlike ordinary people constrained by limited means, he could pursue every desire to its logical conclusion. First Kings 11:3 mentions 700 wives and 300 concubines—reflecting indulgence in sensual pleasure. Yet Deuteronomy 17:17 explicitly prohibited kings from multiplying wives, warning 'that his heart turn not away.' Solomon violated this prohibition, and 1 Kings 11:4 records the consequence: 'when Solomon was old, his wives turned away his heart after other gods.' Ecclesiastes represents the wisdom gained through painful experience—unlimited indulgence doesn't satisfy but rather exposes the soul's infinite capacity, which only God can fill. Augustine later articulated this truth: humans possess a 'God-shaped vacuum' that nothing else can satisfy. The Puritans emphasized that created things are good gifts to be enjoyed gratefully within God's boundaries, but become idols when pursued as ultimate sources of satisfaction.
Questions for Reflection
What desires are you denying yourself, and what desires are you indulging—and how do you discern between godly self-discipline and harmful deprivation?
How does Solomon's discovery that even unlimited pleasure-seeking yields only temporary enjoyment challenge your expectations about satisfaction?
Analysis & Commentary
And whatsoever mine eyes desired I kept not from them—the Hebrew 'sha'al' (שָׁאַל, desired/asked) suggests eyes making requests that Solomon granted unconditionally. He denied himself nothing visually appealing or aesthetically pleasing. I withheld not my heart from any joy—complete indulgence in every form of pleasure. The phrase 'simchah' (שִׂמְחָה, joy) encompasses happiness, celebration, and delight. Solomon's experiment was comprehensive and unrestrained.
Yet despite unlimited indulgence, he concludes: for my heart rejoiced in all my labour: and this was my portion of all my labour. The Hebrew 'cheleq' (חֵלֶק, portion) refers to one's allotted share or inheritance. After exhausting every pleasure, Solomon's only lasting 'portion' was the temporary enjoyment derived from the work itself—not from accumulated possessions or achievements, but from the process of labor. This prepares for verse 11's devastating conclusion: even this temporary enjoyment proves 'vanity and vexation of spirit.' The verse anticipates Jesus's warning: 'What shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?' (Mark 8:36).