Deuteronomy 13:8
Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him:
Original Language Analysis
Cross References
Historical Context
This law created radical covenant community where spiritual fidelity superseded family loyalty. New Testament parallels: Jesus said He came 'to set a man at variance against his father' (Matthew 10:34-36) when faith divides families. Early Christians faced this—parents disowned believing children, children reported Christian parents to authorities. The first commandment's exclusivity makes covenant loyalty ultimate, relativizing all other bonds. This doesn't mean hating family but prioritizing God above all.
Questions for Reflection
- How do we love family members in practical ways while refusing to enable or conceal their sin?
- What is the difference between appropriate family loyalty and sinful enablement of apostasy?
- How does understanding that God's glory matters most help navigate conflicts between faith and family?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
The command: 'Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him.' This forbids complicity at every level: don't consent (agree), don't listen (entertain), don't pity (feel sympathy), don't spare (protect from consequences), don't conceal (hide the crime). The comprehensive prohibition prevents emotional attachment from overriding covenant duty. Even natural affection for family must not prevent reporting apostasy. This extreme demand underscores idolatry's gravity—it's spiritual treason meriting death. Love for God must exceed all human loves.