Colossians 2:21

(Touch not; taste not; handle not;

Word-by-Word Analysis

Μὴ

G3361

not

(adverb) not, (conjunction) lest; also (as an interrogative implying a negative answer (whereas g3756 expects an affirmative one)) whether

ἅψῃ

G680

(Touch

properly, to attach oneself to, i.e., to touch (in many implied relations)

μηδὲ

G3366

not

but not, not even; in a continued negation, nor

γεύσῃ

G1089

taste

to taste; by implication, to eat; figuratively, to experience (good or ill)

μηδὲ

G3366

not

but not, not even; in a continued negation, nor

θίγῃς

G2345

handle

to manipulate, i.e., have to do with; by implication, to injure

Analysis

This verse develops the salvation theme central to Colossians. The concept of divine revelation reflects the development of salvation within biblical theology. The literary structure and word choice here contribute to biblical literature contributing to the canon's theological witness, advancing the author's theological argument. The original language emphasizes careful word choice that would have carried specific theological weight for the original audience, providing deeper understanding of the author's theological intention.

Historical Context

The literary and historical milieu of the literary conventions and historical circumstances of biblical literature shapes this text's meaning. The historical development of salvation within the theological tradition of Colossians Understanding the ancient worldview that shaped the author's theological expression helps modern readers appreciate why the author emphasizes divine revelation in this particular way.

Questions for Reflection

What systematic theological implications arise from this verse's treatment of salvation, and how does it contribute to a biblical theology of soteriology and the doctrine of salvation?
How does the salvation theme in this verse connect to the overarching narrative of Scripture, and what does this reveal about God's character and purposes?
How might the original audience's understanding of divine revelation differ from modern interpretations, and what bridges can be built between ancient meaning and contemporary application?